...
首页> 外文期刊>Minimally invasive therapy and allied technologies: MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy >Dynamic graciloplasty versus implant of artificial sphincter for continent perineal colostomy after Miles' procedure: Technique and early results
【24h】

Dynamic graciloplasty versus implant of artificial sphincter for continent perineal colostomy after Miles' procedure: Technique and early results

机译:Miles手术后动态gra突术与人工括约肌植入术在大陆会阴结肠造口术中的应用:技术和早期结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abdominoperineal resection (APR) is still the standard surgical treatment of anorectal cancers close to the dentate line. Unfortunately, a permanent iliac colostomy is a severe limitation of the quality of life. Attempts to construct a continent perineal colostomy after anorectal excision have been made over the last 15 years with uncertain benefits. We report on our early results of two different procedures consisting of a laparoscopic approach to abdominoperineal rectal excision, fashioning a perineal colostomy with dynamic graciloplasty or implant of an artificial sphincter. Between 2000 and 2004, a total of six patients underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection or reversal of Miles' procedure and construction of perineal colostomy with dynamic graciloplasty (three cases) or implant of an artificial bowel sphincter (three cases). A diverting loop ileostomy was constructed in all patients to prevent contamination. Data.concerning the perioperative management, postoperative morbidity and mortality and function after total anorectal reconstruction at the time of discharge, at postoperative month 1 and after ileostomy closure were collected and evaluated in a prospective non-randomised fashion. No early postoperative complications occurred in both groups. No late complication occurred in the dynamic graciloplasty group, whilst one patient of the artificial sphincter group had an ulceration of the tubing and the control pump through the suprapubic skin and the labium skin respectively on postoperative day 35. Another patient in this group, with an erosion of the transposed colon wall, died of myocardial infarction on postoperative day 75 after removal of the prosthesis. Postoperative stay after artificial sphincter implant and dynamic graciloplasty ranged from 12 to 27 days and 16 to 24 days, respectively. The loop ileostomy was closed at postoperative month 3 in all remaining patients except for one in the dynamic graciloplasty group, who died one day before hospitalization for ostomy closure because of an accidental, not disease/ operation related reason. Follow-up of patients of the dynamic graciloplasty and artificial sphincter groups ranged from 3 to 24 months and 2.5 to 9.5 months, respectively. Patients in the dynamic graciloplasty group had no complications and follow-up showed satisfactory continence (SF36 form). All patients in the artificial sphincter group had late local complications with erosion of the prosthesis through the wall, its consequent removal and construction of a permanent iliac colostomy. Laparoscopic APR has been reported to be as safe as open APR. There are no published, available data on laparoscopic APR and laparoscopic reversal of Miles' procedure with total anorectal reconstruction with either dynamic graciloplasty or implant of artificial sphincter. Preliminary results showed that laparoscopic APR and APR reversal with continent perineal colostomy and dynamic graciloplasty may be a possible option in selected patients whilst the implant of an artificial sphincter should not be considered as a safe surgical option in such patients.
机译:腹腔手术切除(APR)仍是接近齿状线的肛门直肠癌的标准外科治疗方法。不幸的是,永久性结肠造口术是生活质量的严重限制。在过去的15年中,人们曾尝试在肛肠切除后建造一个大陆会阴结肠造口术,但收益不确定。我们报告了两种不同程序的早期结果,其中包括腹腔镜手术切除腹腔直肠直肠切除术,采用动态眼睑成形术或人工括约肌植入术形成会阴结肠造口术。在2000年至2004年之间,总共有6例患者接受了腹腔镜腹腔手术切除或Miles手术逆转,并采用动态gra囊成形术进行会阴结肠造瘘术(3例)或人工肠括约肌植入术(3例)。所有患者均进行了分流回肠造口术,以防止污染。收集有关围手术期管理,出院时,术后第1个月和回肠造口术关闭后全肛门直肠重建后的术后发病率,死亡率和功能的数据,并采用前瞻性非随机方式进行评估。两组均未发生早期术后并发症。动力gra屈术组未发生晚期并发症,而人工括约肌组的一名患者在术后第35天通过耻骨上皮肤和阴唇皮肤的管子和控制泵发生了溃疡。移走假体后第75天,转位结肠壁受到侵蚀,死于心肌梗塞。人工括约肌植入术后的动态停留时间为12至27天,动态泪囊成形术为16至24天。其余所有患者均在术后第3个月关闭回肠回肠造口术,但动态睫状体成形术组中的一名除外,他们因非偶然原因(与疾病/手术无关)死于因造瘘术而住院治疗的前一天死亡。动态gra突成形术和人工括约肌组的患者随访时间分别为3到24个月和2.5到9.5个月。动态gra囊成形术组患者无并发症,随访结果显示满意的节制(SF36形式)。人工括约肌组的所有患者都有局部局部并发症,包括假体穿过壁的侵蚀,随后的切除和永久性col结肠造瘘术。据报道,腹腔镜APR与开放APR一样安全。目前尚无关于腹腔镜APR和腹腔镜逆转Miles手术并进行动态gra突术或人工括约肌植入术的全肛门直肠重建术的可用数据。初步结果表明,腹腔镜APR和APR逆转大陆会阴结肠造瘘术和动态gra突成形术在某些患者中可能是一种选择,而在这种患者中不应考虑植入人工括约肌作为安全的手术选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号