首页> 外文期刊>International journal of urology: official journal of the Japanese Urological Association >Systemic chemotherapy in patients with indwelling ureteral stenting.
【24h】

Systemic chemotherapy in patients with indwelling ureteral stenting.

机译:留置输尿管支架置入患者的全身化疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether systemic chemotherapy increased episodes of acute pyelonephritis (APN) in patients with an indwelling double-J stent due to non-urological malignant ureteral obstruction. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on a total of 74 patients (16 men and 58 women; median age, 53.0; range, 34-84 years) with non-urological malignant ureteral obstruction, who were managed by double-J stenting between October 1997 and December 2001. The patients were divided into those who received (33 patients, group I) and those who did not receive systemic chemotherapy (41 patients, group II) during the stent indwelling period (median, 7.0; range, 1-44 month). Routine antibiotic prophylaxis was not administered to any patient. Median follow-up was 10.5 (range, 1-45) months. Clinical features, including the incidence of febrility and APN, were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Of the 74 patients, 18 patients (24.3%) experienced acute febrile episodes during ureteral stenting, but only five (6.8%) patients were diagnosed as having APN. No significant difference in the incidence of fever or APN was found between the two groups (P = 1.000 and P = 0.651, respectively). Univariate logistic analysis indicated that only the duration of follow-up was a risk factor for an episode of fever. Other parameters had no clinical significance. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that systemic chemotherapy may not predispose the risk of acute pyelonephritis in patients with an indwelling ureteral stent due to non-urological malignant ureteral obstruction.
机译:背景:我们调查了因非泌尿系统恶性输尿管梗阻而留置双J支架的患者,全身化疗是否会增加急性肾盂肾炎(APN)发作。方法:回顾性研究共计74例患者(男16例,女58例;中位年龄53.0;范围34-84岁),他们于10月之间接受双J支架置入术治疗1997年和2001年12月。将患者分为在支架置入期间接受治疗的患者(I组33例)和未接受全身化疗的患者(41组II)(中位7.0;范围1-44)。月)。没有对任何患者进行常规的抗生素预防。中位随访时间为10.5(范围:1-45)个月。比较两组的临床特征,包括高热和APN的发生率。结果:在74例患者中,有18例(24.3%)在输尿管支架置入过程中经历了急性发热发作,但只有5例(6.8%)被诊断为患有APN。两组之间发烧或APN的发生率无显着差异(分别为P = 1.000和P = 0.651)。单因素逻辑分析表明,仅随访时间是发烧发作的危险因素。其他参数无临床意义。结论:我们的研究结果提示,由于非泌尿系统恶性输尿管梗阻,在留置输尿管支架的患者中,全身化疗可能不会诱发急性肾盂肾炎的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号