Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Park D. A.; Lee D. H.; Kim S. W.; Lee S. H.

首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Surgical Oncology: The Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology >Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

【24h】

Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译：机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术与常规腹腔镜和剖腹术治疗子宫内膜癌的安全性和有效性的比较：系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the surgical safety and clinical effectiveness of RH compared to OH and LH for endometrial cancer.

机译：目的：本研究旨在评估RH与OH和LH相比对子宫内膜癌的手术安全性和临床有效性。

著录项

来源
《European Journal of Surgical Oncology: The Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology》 |2016年第9期|共12页
作者
Park D. A.; Lee D. H.; Kim S. W.; Lee S. H.;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类肿瘤学;
关键词
Endometrial cancer; Robotic hysterectomy; Radical hysterectomy; Open hysterectomy; Laparoscopic hysterectomy;

机译：子宫内膜癌;机器人子宫切除术;根治性子宫切除术;开放性子宫切除术;腹腔镜子宫切除术;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J] . Park D. A., Lee D. H., Kim S. W., European Journal of Surgical Oncology: The Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology . 2016,第9期

机译：机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术与常规腹腔镜和剖腹术治疗子宫内膜癌的安全性和有效性的比较：系统评价和荟萃分析
2. Robot-assisted surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J] . Xie Weimin, Cao Dongyan, Yang Jiaxin, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology . 2016,第10期

机译：机器人辅助手术与常规腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜癌：系统评价和荟萃分析
3. Comparative effectiveness of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis [J] . Canadian Journal of Mathematics . 2020,第3期

机译：膀胱癌开放，腹腔镜和机器人和机器人辅助自由基膀胱切除术的比较效果：系统综述与网络荟萃分析
4. Indoor Tanning and the Risk of Developing Non-Cutaneous Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [C] . Dylan E. OSulllvan, Troy Hillier, Darren R. Brenner, Joint annual meeting of the International Society of Exposure Science and the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology . 2018

机译：室内日光浴和发展非慢性癌的风险：系统评价和荟萃分析
5. Comparison of Hospital Length of Stay and Readmissions by Surgical Approach in the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer in Washington State, 2008-2011: Robotic Assisted Surgery Compared with Laparoscopy and Laparotomy [D] . Beck, Tiffany L. 2015

机译：2008-2011年华盛顿州通过子宫内膜癌手术入院和手术入院率的比较：机器人辅助手术与腹腔镜和剖腹术的比较
6. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in randomized controlled trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis [O] . Hyunsuk Frank Roh, Seung Hyuk Nam, Jung Mogg Kim -1

机译：随机对照试验中机器人辅助腹腔镜手术与常规腹腔镜手术的比较：系统评价和荟萃分析
7. PCN24 Clinical Effectiveness And Safety Of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Traditional Laparotomy For Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review [O] . Park D 2015

机译：PCN24机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术与传统剖腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的临床有效性和安全性：系统评价

Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅