...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Surgical Oncology: The Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology >Pain experienced by patients during minimal-invasive ultrasound-guided breast biopsy: vacuum-assisted vs core-needle procedure.
【24h】

Pain experienced by patients during minimal-invasive ultrasound-guided breast biopsy: vacuum-assisted vs core-needle procedure.

机译:患者在微创超声引导下的乳腺穿刺活检过程中经历的疼痛:真空辅助vs核心针头手术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

AIMS: To evaluate comparatively the pain associated with ultrasound-guided core-needle (CN) and vacuum-assisted (VA) biopsy for non-palpable breast lesions. METHODS: 723 women undergoing ultrasound-guided breast biopsy for BIRADS IV and V lesions according to the same standardised protocol were prospectively studied. 14-gauge CN biopsy with an automated gun was performed in 321 patients. In 402 women biopsy was made using 11-gauge VA hand-held probe. Immediately after the procedure patients were interviewed about the pain experienced during the biopsy and were asked to indicate at the pain intensity on a eleven-point scale: from 0 (none) to 10 (extreme, worst possible pain). RESULTS: The median rate of pain experienced by women during biopsy was 4 (range 2-7). There were no significant differences between CN and VA groups with regard to age, body mass index, menopausal status, history of parity, hormone replacement therapy, menopausal status, breast parenchymal pattern (according to Wolfe's classification), family history of breast cancer, lesion size and number of samples. CN biopsy with an automated gun was significantly more painful (P < 0.01) than procedure with VA hand-held device as evaluated by patients: median 6 (4-7) vs 3 (2-5), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite using the larger needle VA procedure results in less pain experienced by women in comparison to CN biopsy with automated gun. Reduced patient discomfort should be one of the reasons for the preferential use of VA biopsy in the assessment of non-palpable breast masses.
机译:目的:比较评估超声引导下的穿刺针(CN)和真空辅助(VA)活检对无法触及的乳腺病变的疼痛。方法:前瞻性研究了723例根据相同的标准化方案行BIRADS IV和V病变的超声引导下乳房活检的妇女。 321例患者用自动枪进行了14号CN活检。在402名妇女中,使用11号VA手持式探头进行了活检。手术后,立即就活检过程中经历的疼痛采访患者,并要求他们以11分制来指示疼痛强度:从0(无)到10(最大,最严重的疼痛)。结果:妇女在活检过程中经历的疼痛中位率为4(范围2-7)。 CN和VA组之间在年龄,体重指数,更年期状态,均等史,激素替代疗法,绝经状态,乳腺癌实质模式(根据Wolfe分类),乳腺癌家族史,病变方面无显着差异。样本的大小和数量。根据患者评估,用自动枪进行的CN活检比使用VA手持设备的手术痛苦明显更大(P <0.01):中位数分别为6(4-7)比3(2-5)。结论:与使用自动枪进行CN活检相比,尽管使用了较大的针头VA手术可以减轻女性的痛苦。减少患者不适感应是评估无法触及的乳腺肿块时优先使用VA活检的原因之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号