首页> 外文期刊>Mineral Law Newsletter >CORPORATION COMMISSION JURISDICTION TO OKDER REMEDIATION OF SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE POLLUTION Is NOT EXCLUSIVE
【24h】

CORPORATION COMMISSION JURISDICTION TO OKDER REMEDIATION OF SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE POLLUTION Is NOT EXCLUSIVE

机译:公司委员会辖制更好地修复表面和表面污染

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Meinders v. Johnson, 2006 OK CIV APP 35, 134 P.3d 858 (Okla. Civ. App. 2006), the Plaintiff surface owner sued oil and gas working interest owners and operators in state district court for damages and injunctive relief arising out of the condition of the surface and the subsurface of the land as a result of oil and gas operations extending back to the 1920s. As a result of years of operations, the land had become dotted with many abandoned and unplugged wells, abandoned equipment, visible signs of surface pollution from brine and mineral spills, and severe erosion, much of which originated with prior operators. The plaintiff sought damages for surface and subsurface pollution and injunctive relief to compel clean-up and remediation of surface and subsurface pollution. The plaintiff later dropped his damage claims and pursued only injunctive relief. The trial court determined that the defendants created or maintained a continuing public nuisance on the plaintiff's property and directed various clean-up measures including plugging of abandoned wells, the recasing of inadequately cased wells to 50 feet below treatable water or the plugging of those wells, cessation of salt water injection operations without an Oklahoma Corporation Commission permit, restoration of the surface of polluted areas to a condition free of erosion with soil quality and chemical composition that will maintain native grasses, and the removal and disposition of abandoned pipe and equipment.
机译:在Meinders诉Johnson一案中,2006 OK CIV APP 35,134 P.3d 858(Okla。Civ。App。2006)中,原告地面所有人在州地方法院起诉石油和天然气工作权益所有人和经营者,要求其赔偿损失和禁令救济石油和天然气开采活动可以追溯到1920年代,因此它脱离了陆地表面和地下条件。经过多年的运营,这片土地上散布着许多废弃和不堵塞的水井,废弃的设备,可见的盐水和矿物质溢出造成的表面污染迹象以及严重的侵蚀,其中许多是先前的运营商造成的。原告寻求对表层和地下污染的损害赔偿以及禁令救济,以迫使对表层和地下污染进行清理和补救。原告后来放弃了损害赔偿要求,仅寻求禁令救济。初审法院裁定,被告对原告的财产造成或保持了持续的公众滋扰,并指示了各种清理措施,包括堵塞废弃的井,将装满案例不足的井重新装到可治疗水面以下50英尺处或封堵了这些井,未经俄克拉荷马州公司委员会的许可而停止盐水注入操作,将污染区域的表面恢复到不腐蚀的状态,土壤质量和化学成分将维持天然草,并清除和处置废弃的管道和设备。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号