...
首页> 外文期刊>Mineralium deposita >Tracing element sources of hydrothermal mineral deposits: REE and Y distribution and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes in fluorite from MVT deposits in the Pennine Orefield, England
【24h】

Tracing element sources of hydrothermal mineral deposits: REE and Y distribution and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes in fluorite from MVT deposits in the Pennine Orefield, England

机译:热液矿物沉积的示踪元素来源:英格兰Pennine Orefield MVT沉积物中萤石中的REE和Y分布以及Sr-Nd-Pb同位素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Fluorite from Mississippi Valley Type (MVT) deposits in the South Pennine Orefield, England, displays significantly different distributions of rare earths and yttrium (REY) compared to fluorite from similar MVT deposits in the North Pennine Orefield. Samples from the South Pennine Orefield display negative Ce and positive Gd and Y anomalies but lack any Eu anomaly, indicating that the REY were mobilized from relatively pure marine sedimentary carbonates. In marked contrast, fluorite from the North Pennine Orefield lacks any Ce and Gd anomalies but shows a pronounced positive Eu anomaly, suggesting that the REY were provided by different source rock(s), that the mineralizing hydrothermal fluid had experienced higher temperatures prior to fluorite precipitation, and that it was derived from deeper crustal levels in the north compared to the south. The isotopic composition of Sr in Blue John fluorite from the South Pennine Orefield suggests that Sr was mobilized from Lower Carboniferous (Tournaisian) limestones, whereas Pb isotopes suggest that in contrast to REY and Sr, Pb was derived from aluminosilicate rocks. Neither Nd nor Sr or Pb isotopes can be used to radiometrically date the formation of Blue John fluorite. All isotope systems studied indicate that the limestone host rock of this fluorite mineralization did not contribute to the trace element budget of the hydrothermal fluid. Our results show that different solutes in a natural water (hydrothermal fluid, groundwater, etc.) may be derived from different sources, and that the study of a small set of elements or isotope ratios may not provide full insight into the genesis or history of a mineralization or a hydrothermal fluid. Our data provide evidence for the uncoupling of Sr, Nd and Pb during fluid-rock interaction and fluid migration, and show that the use of plots such as ~(87)Sr/ ~(86)Sr vs. implied by _(Nd). to learn about mixing relationships (as is commonly done in igneous geochemistry) is unreliable when applied to natural waters and their precipitates.
机译:与来自北彭宁奥雷菲尔德类似MVT矿床的萤石相比,来自英格兰南彭宁奥雷菲尔德的密西西比河谷类型(MVT)矿床的萤石显示出稀土和钇(REY)的分布明显不同。南Pennine Orefield的样品显示出Ce异常,Gd和Y异常,但没有Eu异常,表明REY是从相对纯净的海洋沉积碳酸盐中调集的。与之形成鲜明对比的是,来自北宾夕法尼亚矿区的萤石没有任何Ce和Gd异常,但显示出明显的正Eu异常,这表明REY是由不同的烃源岩提供的,矿化的热液在经历萤石之前就经历了较高的温度。这是由于北部的地壳水平高于南部。来自南Pennine Orefield的Blue John萤石中Sr的同位素组成表明,Sr是从下石炭统(土尔尼人)的石灰岩中迁移出来的,而Pb同位素表明,与REY和Sr相反,Pb来源于铝硅酸盐岩。 Nd或Sr或Pb同位素均不能用于射线照相法确定Blue John萤石的形成。所有研究的同位素系统都表明,这种萤石矿化的石灰岩基质岩石没有对热液的微量元素收支作出贡献。我们的结果表明,天然水(热液,地下水等)中的不同溶质可能来自不同的来源,并且对少量元素或同位素比的研究可能无法提供对甲烷的成因或历史的全面了解。矿化或热液。我们的数据为流体-岩石相互作用和流体迁移过程中Sr,Nd和Pb的解耦提供了证据,并表明使用〜(87)Sr /〜(86)Sr与_(Nd)隐含关系图的使用。当将其应用于天然水及其沉淀物时,了解混合关系(在火成地球化学中通常如此)是不可靠的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号