首页> 外文期刊>Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology. >The comparison of weekly and three-weekly cisplatin chemotherapy concurrent with radiotherapy in patients with previously untreated inoperable non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
【24h】

The comparison of weekly and three-weekly cisplatin chemotherapy concurrent with radiotherapy in patients with previously untreated inoperable non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

机译:先前未经治疗无法治疗的头颈部非转移性鳞状细胞癌患者每周和每周三次顺铂化疗与放疗的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: Several studies have shown that the concurrent administration of chemotherapy (CHT) and radiotherapy (RT) is superior to RT alone in patients with inoperable non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (InSCCHN). We compared the efficacy and safety profile of RT and concurrent cisplatin CHT given in two different schedules to patients with previously untreated InSCCHN. METHODS: Fifty patients with previously untreated InSCCHN admitted to our oncology department were included in the study. Thirty of 50 (60%) patients with a younger age or good performance status (PS) (ECOG 0-1) received cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on a 21-day schedule (group A). Other 20 (40%) patients with older age or poor PS (ECOG 2) received cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) on a 7-day schedule (group B). Each of the 50 patients received concurrent conventional dose RT according to primer tumor location. RESULTS: The median follow-up is 12 months for group A and 12.5 months for group B. Twenty-eight (93.3%) patients in group A and 18 (90%) in group B were evaluable for response. The complete response rate was 50% in group A and 40% in group B (P > 0.05). The objective response rate was 92% in group A and 90% in group B (P > 0.05). All grade 3-4 toxic events were seen in 16 (53.3%) of group A patients and 8 (40%) of group B patients (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Comparison between two treatment modalities appears to result in statistically similar response rates and adverse event profile. A randomized phase III trial is required to confirm the safety and efficacy of weekly cisplatin therapy in patients with poor PS and/or older age at diagnosis.
机译:目的:多项研究表明,在无法手术的头颈部非转移性鳞状细胞癌(InSCCHN)患者中,同时应用化学疗法(CHT)和放疗(RT)优于单纯使用RT。我们比较了以两种不同的方案对先前未经治疗的InSCCHN患者进行RT和并发顺铂CHT的疗效和安全性。方法:本研究纳入了50例先前未经治疗的InSCCHN患者,该患者被我们的肿瘤科收治。 30名(60%)年龄较小或表现良好(PS)(ECOG 0-1)的患者按21天的时间表接受顺铂100 mg / m(2)(A组)。其他20名(40%)年龄较大或PS不良(ECOG 2)的患者按7天的时间表接受顺铂40 mg / m(2)(B组)。根据引物肿瘤的位置,50例患者中的每例均接受常规常规剂量RT治疗。结果:A组的中位随访时间为12个月,B组的中位随访时间为12.5个月。A组的28位患者(93.3%)和B组的18位患者(90%)可以评估反应。 A组的完全缓解率为50%,B组为40%(P> 0.05)。 A组的客观缓解率为92%,B组为90%(P> 0.05)。在A组患者中有16例(53.3%)和B组患者中有8例(40%)出现了所有3-4级毒性事件(P> 0.05)。结论:两种治疗方式之间的比较似乎导致统计学上相似的缓解率和不良事件发生率。需要一项随机的III期试验来确认每周PS不良和/或年龄较大的患者在诊断时每周进行顺铂治疗的安全性和有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号