首页> 外文期刊>Microscopy research and technique >Comparing dry ashing and wet oxidation methods. The case of the rice husk (Oryza sativa L.)
【24h】

Comparing dry ashing and wet oxidation methods. The case of the rice husk (Oryza sativa L.)

机译:比较干灰和湿氧化方法。稻壳的情况(Oryza sativa L.)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Experiments were conducted to determine the effects that different methods for the preparation of modern plant samples have on the resulting phytoliths using rice husks (Oryza sp.). The methods that are commonly used in phytolith extraction include (1) dry ashing, (2) acid extraction (3) a combination of both techniques. The results showed that processing methods have an impact on the morphology of two subspecies of rice phytoliths, dry ashing producing more conjoined cell phytoliths or multicells phytoliths than acid extraction. Using a combination of both methods resulted in the presence of fewer conjoined cells than dry ashing alone, but more conjoined cells than acid extraction. Alternative explanations are proposed to explain the formation of conjoined phytolith cells.
机译:进行了实验以确定使用稻壳(Oryza sp。)制备现代植物样品的不同方法对所得植硅石的影响。藻石提取中常用的方法包括(1)干灰化(2)酸提取(3)两种技术的组合。结果表明,加工方法对水稻亚纲的两个亚种的形态有影响,干灰比酸提取法产生更多的联合细胞纲或多细胞纲。结合使用两种方法,与单独的干灰相比,存在更少的联合细胞,但是与酸提取相比,联合细胞更多。提出了替代性解释来解释相连的植石细胞的形成。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号