...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology. >A randomized phase II study of weekly docetaxel/cisplatin versus weekly docetaxel/oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer
【24h】

A randomized phase II study of weekly docetaxel/cisplatin versus weekly docetaxel/oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer

机译:每周多西他赛/顺铂与每周多西他赛/奥沙利铂作为一线治疗晚期胃癌患者的随机II期研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Docetaxel, in combination with cisplatin or oxaliplatin, has demonstrated efficacy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This randomized, non-comparative phase II trial evaluated two weekly docetaxel-based regimens to determine which is the most promising in terms of efficacy and safety as a front-line therapy in AGC. Methods: Chemotherapy-na?ve patients with measurable unresectable and/or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel (35 mg/m2) weekly on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle plus either cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 1) (wDP) or oxaliplatin (120 mg/m2 on day 1) (wDO). Results: Of the 77 randomly assigned patients, 76 patients (38 per arm) received one of the study treatments. Overall, response rate (ORR) was 37 % for wDP and 41 % for wDO. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.9 and 4.4 months for wDP and wDO, respectively, and median overall survival (OS) was 9.7 and 12.3 months, respectively. Exploratory analyses showed no significant difference between wDP and wDO in terms of ORR (P = 0.707), PFS (P = 0.324), or OS (P = 0.581). The main grade 3 or 4 toxicity in the wDP and wDO groups was neutropenia (47 % in both groups). wDO was less associated with nausea (66 vs. 82 %) and vomiting (39 vs. 63 %), but more associated with peripheral neuropathy (68 vs. 39 %) than wDP. Rates of overall grade 3 or 4 adverse events were similar (wDP 66 vs. wDO 68 %). Conclusions: wDP and wDO were found to be equally active and tolerable as front-line treatments in AGC.
机译:背景:多西紫杉醇与顺铂或奥沙利铂联合使用已显示出对晚期胃癌(AGC)的疗效。这项随机的,非比较性的II期临床试验评估了每周两次基于多西紫杉醇的治疗方案,以确定哪一种在作为AGC一线治疗的疗效和安全性方面最有前途。方法:未经化疗的可测量的不可切除和/或转移性胃腺癌患者被随机分配在21天周期的第1天和第8天每周接受多西他赛(35 mg / m2)加顺铂(60 mg / m2)。第1天(wDP)或奥沙利铂(第1天120 mg / m2)(wDO)。结果:在77位随机分配的患者中,有76位患者(每组38位)接受了一项研究治疗。总体而言,wDP的响应率(ORR)为37%,wDO的响应率为41%。 wDP和wDO的中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为4.9和4.4个月,中位总生存期(OS)分别为9.7和12.3个月。探索性分析显示,wDP和wDO在ORR(P = 0.707),PFS(P = 0.324)或OS(P = 0.581)方面无显着差异。 wDP和wDO组的主要3级或4级毒性是中性粒细胞减少症(两组均为47%)。与wDP相比,wDO与恶心(66%vs. 82%)和呕吐(39%vs. 63%)的关联性更小,但与周围神经病变的关联性更高(68%vs. 39%)。总体3级或4级不良事件发生率相似(wDP 66 vs. wDO 68%)。结论:发现wDP和wDO与AGC的一线治疗同等有效且可耐受。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号