首页> 外文期刊>Midwifery >Are there inequalities in choice of birthing position? Sociodemographic and labour factors associated with the supine position during the second stage of labour.
【24h】

Are there inequalities in choice of birthing position? Sociodemographic and labour factors associated with the supine position during the second stage of labour.

机译:生育位置选择是否存在不平等?第二产程中仰卧位相关的社会人口统计学和劳动因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: to establish which factors are associated with birthing positions throughout the second stage of labour and at the time of birth. DESIGN: retrospective cohort study. SETTING: primary care midwifery practices in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 665 low-risk women who received midwife-led care. MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS: a postal questionnaire was sent to women 3-4 years after birth. The number of women who remained in the supine position throughout the second stage varied between midwifery practices, ranging from 31.3% to 95.9% (p<0.001). The majority of women pushed and gave birth in the supine position. For positions used throughout the second stage of labour, a stepwise forward logistic regression analysis was used to examine effects controlled for other factors. Women aged 36 years and highly educated women were less likely to use the supine pushing position alone [odds ratio (OR) 0.54, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.31-0.94; OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.21-0.73, respectively]. Women who pushed for longer than 60 minutes and who were referred during the second stage of labour were also less likely to use the supine position alone (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16-0.64; OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.86, respectively). Bivariate analyses were conducted for effects on position at the time of birth. Age 36 years, higher education and homebirth were associated with giving birth in a non-supine position. KEY CONCLUSIONS: the finding that highly educated and older women were more likely to use non-supine birthing positions suggests inequalities in position choice. Although the Dutch maternity care system empowers women to choose their own place of birth, many may not be encouraged to make choices in birthing positions. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: education of women, midwives, obstetricians and perhaps the public in general is necessary to make alternatives to the supine position a logical option for all women. Future studies need to establish midwife, clinical and other factors that have an effect on women's choice of birthing positions, and identify strategies that empower women to make their own choices.
机译:目的:确定哪些因素与第二产程和分娩时的分娩状况有关。设计:回顾性队列研究。地点:荷兰的初级保健助产实践。参加者:665名接受助产士指导的低风险妇女。测量和结果:在出生后3-4年向女性发送了邮政问卷。在整个第二阶段中,保持仰卧位的妇女人数在助产实践之间有所不同,从31.3%到95.9%不等(p <0.001)。大多数妇女以仰卧位推产。对于整个分娩第二阶段使用的职位,采用逐步前向逻辑回归分析来检查受其他因素控制的影响。 36岁的女性和受过良好教育的女性不太可能单独使用仰卧推姿势[赔率(OR)0.54,95%置信区间(CI)0.31-0.94;或分别为0.40、95%CI 0.21-0.73]。催产时间超过60分钟且在第二次分娩期间转诊的女性也不太可能单独使用仰卧位(OR 0.32,95%CI 0.16-0.64; OR 0.44,95%CI 0.23-0.86 )。对出生时对姿势的影响进行了双变量分析。年龄36岁,受过高等教育和分娩与在非仰卧位分娩有关。关键结论:受过高等教育的高龄妇女更倾向于使用非仰卧位,这一发现表明了在职位选择上的不平等。尽管荷兰的孕产妇保健系统使妇女有权选择自己的出生地,但可能不鼓励许多人在生育岗位上做出选择。实践的意义:对妇女,助产士,妇产科医生甚至一般公众进行教育对于使仰卧位替代方案成为所有妇女的合乎逻辑的选择是必要的。未来的研究需要确定助产士,临床和其他因素,这些因素会影响妇女对生育位置的选择,并确定赋予妇女权力的战略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号