首页> 外文期刊>Cancer causes and control: CCC >Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk: results from three cohort studies in the DIETSCAN project.
【24h】

Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk: results from three cohort studies in the DIETSCAN project.

机译:饮食习惯和乳腺癌风险:DIETSCAN项目的三项队列研究结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Only a few consistent findings on individual foods or nutrients that influence breast cancer risk have emerged thus far. Since people do not consume individual foods but certain combinations of them, the analysis of dietary patterns may offer an additional aspect for assessing associations between diet and diseases such as breast cancer. It is also important to examine whether the relationships between dietary patterns and breast cancer risk are consistent across populations. METHODS: We examined the risk of breast cancer with two dietary patterns, identified as "Vegetables" (VEG) and "Pork, Processed Meat, Potatoes" (PPP), common to all cohorts of the DIETSCAN project. During 7 to 13 years of follow-up, three of the cohorts--the Netherlands Cohort Study on diet and cancer (NLCS), the Swedish Mammography Cohort (SMC), and the Ormoni e Dieta nella Eziologia dei Tumori (Italy-ORDET)--provided data on 3271 breast cancer cases with complete information on their baseline diet measured by a validated food frequency questionnaire. RESULTS: After adjustment for potential confounders, VEG was not associated with the risk of breast cancer across all cohorts. PPP was also not associated with the risk of breast cancer in SMC and ORDET, but a high PPP score tended to be inversely associated with breast cancer in the NLCS study (RR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52-0.92, highest versus lowest quartile). PPP differed in one aspect between the cohorts: butter loaded positively on the pattern in all cohorts except NLCS, in which butter loaded negatively and appeared to be substituted by low-fat margarine loading positively. CONCLUSION: In general, the dietary patterns showed consistent results across the three cohorts except for the possible protective effect of PPP in the NLCS cohort, which could be explained by a difference in that pattern for NLCS. The results supported the suggestion derived from traditional epidemiology that relatively recent diet may not have an important role in the etiology of breast cancer.
机译:目的:到目前为止,关于影响乳腺癌风险的各种食物或营养素的研究结果只有少数一致的发现。由于人们不是食用单个食物而是某些食物的组合,因此饮食模式的分析可能会为评估饮食与诸如乳腺癌等疾病之间的关联性提供另一个方面。检查饮食模式与乳腺癌风险之间的关系在各个人群之间是否一致也很重要。方法:我们通过DIETSCAN项目的所有人群共有的两种饮食模式(分别称为“蔬菜”(VEG)和“猪肉,加工肉,土豆”(PPP))检查了乳腺癌的风险。在7到13年的随访期间,其中三个队列-荷兰饮食与癌症队列研究(NLCS),瑞典乳房X线照相术队列(SMC)和Ormoni e Dieta nella Eziologia dei Tumori(意大利-ORDET) -提供了3271例乳腺癌病例的数据,并通过经过验证的食物频率问卷对基线饮食提供了完整的信息。结果:在调整了潜在的混杂因素后,VEG与所有人群的乳腺癌风险均不相关。 PPP也与SMC和ORDET中的乳腺癌风险无关,但在NLCS研究中,较高的PPP得分往往与乳腺癌成反比(RR = 0.69; 95%CI,0.52-0.92,最高四分位数与最低四分位数)。 PPP在一组之间在一个方面有所不同:除NLCS以外,所有队列中的黄油均呈正向装载,其中黄油呈负向并且似乎被低脂人造黄油正向替代。结论:总体而言,饮食模式在三个队列中显示出一致的结果,除了PPP在NLCS队列中可能产生的保护作用外,这可以通过NLCS的模式差异来解释。结果支持了从传统流行病学得出的建议,即相对较新的饮食在乳腺癌的病因学中可能没有重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号