【24h】

Comparison of an ultrasonic interferometer manometer and a static expansion system using a capacitance diaphragm gauge

机译:超声波干涉仪压力计与使用电容膜片计的静态扩展系统的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The paper describes the results of a comparison of two primary low-pressure standards, (i) the Ultrasonic Interferometer Manometer (UIM) and (ii) the Static Expansion Apparatus (SEA), maintained at the National Physical Laboratory (NPLI), India. The comparison was carried out by employing a capacitance diaphragm gauge (CDG) of 1333 Pa full-scale range as the transfer standard over the pressure range 1 Pa to 1000 Pa. For pressures of 20 Pa and above, the values of the calibration factor of the CDG obtained on the SEA deviate 0,10 % from the values by the thermal transpiration equation and this deviation increases to over 0,4 % for pressures lower than 20 Pa. For the UIM, the deviation is found below 0,05 % at pressures of 100 Pa and above, but increases to 0,8 % for pressures as low as 1 Pa. The comparison (i) establishes the mutual compatibility of the two primary standards in the region of pressure overlap and (ii) sets limits to the uncertainty of measurements made on the two systems, which are 0,2 % at 1000 Pa and 1,0 % at 10~(-4) Pa for the SEA and 0,0014 % at 1000 Pa and 1,4 % at 1 Pa for the UIM.
机译:本文介绍了两种主要低压标准的比较结果:(i)超声干涉仪压力计(UIM)和(ii)静态膨胀仪(SEA),其由印度国家物理实验室(NPLI)维护。比较是通过使用1333至1000 Pa压力范围内满量程的1333 Pa电容膜片计(CDG)作为传输标准进行的。对于20 Pa及更高的压力,校准系数的值应为在SEA上获得的CDG与热蒸发方程的值相差0.1%,并且对于低于20 Pa的压力,该偏差增大到0.4%以上。对于UIM,在200°C时偏差低于0.05%。压力为100 Pa或更高,但对于低至1 Pa的压力增加到0.8%。比较(i)建立了两个主要标准在压力重叠区域的相互兼容性,并且(ii)设置了对压力的限制这两个系统的测量不确定度,SEA分别为0.2%(1000 Pa)和1,0%(10〜(-4)Pa),0.004%(1000 Pa)和1.4%(1 Pa) UIM。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号