首页> 外文期刊>Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental >In vivo glycated low-density lipoprotein is not more susceptible to oxidation than nonglycated low-density lipoprotein in type 1 diabetes.
【24h】

In vivo glycated low-density lipoprotein is not more susceptible to oxidation than nonglycated low-density lipoprotein in type 1 diabetes.

机译:在1型糖尿病中,体内糖基化的低密度脂蛋白比非糖化的低密度脂蛋白更不容易氧化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It has been suggested that low-density lipoprotein (LDL) modified by glycation may be more susceptible to oxidation and thus, enhance its atherogenicity. Using affinity chromatography, LDL glycated in vivo (G-LDL) and relatively nonglycated. (N-LDL) subfractions can be isolated from the same individual. The extent of and susceptibility to oxidation of N-LDL compared with G-LDL was determined in 15 type 1 diabetic patients. Total LDL was isolated and separated by boronate affinity chromatography into relatively glycated (G-) and nonglycated (N-) subfractions. The extent of glycation, glycoxidation, and lipoxidation, lipid soluble antioxidant content, susceptibility to in vitro oxidation, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-determined particle size and subclass distribution were determined for each subfraction. Glycation, (fructose-lysine) was higher in G-LDL versus N-LDL, (0.28 +/- 0.08 v 0.13 +/- 0.04 mmol/mol lysine, P < .0001). However, levels of glycoxidation/lipoxidation products and of antioxidants were similar or lower in G-LDL compared with N-LDL and were inversely correlated with fructose-lysine (FL) concentrations in G-LDL, but positively correlated in N-LDL. In vitro LDL (CuCl2) oxidation demonstrated a longer lag time for oxidation of G-LDL than N-LDL (50 +/- 0.16 v 37 +/- 0.15 min, P < .01), but there was no difference in the rate or extent of lipid oxidation, nor in any aspect of protein oxidation. Mean LDL particle size and subclass distribution did not differ between G-LDL and N-LDL. Thus, G-LDL from well-controlled type 1 diabetic patients is not more modified by oxidation, more susceptible to oxidation, or smaller than relatively N-LDL, suggesting alternative factors may contribute to the atherogenicity of LDL from type 1 diabetic patients.
机译:已经提出,通过糖基化修饰的低密度脂蛋白(LDL)可能更易于氧化,因此增强了其动脉粥样硬化性。使用亲和色谱法,LDL在体内糖化(G-LDL),而相对未糖化。 (N-LDL)子馏分可以与同一个人分离。在15位1型糖尿病患者中确定了N-LDL与G-LDL相比的氧化程度和易感性。分离总的LDL,并通过硼酸酯亲和色谱法分离为相对糖基化的(G-)和非糖基化的(N-)亚组分。对于每个亚组分,测定了糖基化,糖氧化和脂氧化的程度,脂溶性抗氧化剂的含量,体外氧化的敏感性以及核磁共振(NMR)确定的粒径和亚类分布。与N-LDL相比,G-LDL中的糖化(果糖赖氨酸)更高(0.28 +/- 0.08 v 0.13 +/- 0.04 mmol / mol赖氨酸,P <.0001)。但是,与N-LDL相比,G-LDL中的糖氧化/脂氧化产物和抗氧化剂的水平相似或更低,并且与G-LDL中的果糖-赖氨酸(FL)浓度成反比,但与N-LDL呈正相关。体外LDL(CuCl2)氧化显示G-LDL氧化的延迟时间比N-LDL更长(50 +/- 0.16 v 37 +/- 0.15 min,P <.01),但速率没有差异或脂质氧化的程度,或蛋白质氧化的任何方面。 G-LDL和N-LDL之间的平均LDL粒径和子类分布没有差异。因此,来自控制良好的1型糖尿病患者的G-LDL不会被氧化修饰,更不易被氧化,或者比相对N-LDL更小,这表明其他因素可能有助于1型糖尿病患者的LDL动脉粥样硬化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号