...
首页> 外文期刊>British journal of anaesthesia >Comparison between ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches for subclavian venous catheterization in children - A randomized trial
【24h】

Comparison between ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches for subclavian venous catheterization in children - A randomized trial

机译:超声引导锁骨上锁骨和锁骨下锁骨入路对儿童锁骨下静脉插管的比较-一项随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BackgroundUltrasound (US)-guided subclavian vein (SCV) catheterization via the supraclavicular (SC) or infraclavicular (IC) approaches can be useful in children. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of these approaches.MethodsThis prospective, randomized study included 98 children who were <3 years old, and who were divided into two groups: the SC group (n=49) and the IC group (n=49). All SCV catheterizations were guided by US and performed by a single experienced anaesthesiologist. Data regarding puncture time, number of attempts, successful guidewire insertion, catheter insertion time, and complications were analysed.ResultsThe median puncture time was longer in the IC group than the SC group (48 vs 36 s, P=0.02). Multiple attempts (number of attempts >3) were more frequently required in the IC group than the SC group (24.5 vs 6.1%, P=0.01). The incidence of guidewire misplacement was higher in the IC group than that of the SC group [10 (20.4%) vs 0 (0%), P=0.001]. Catheterization was successfully performed in all patients. No pneumothoraces or arterial punctures occurred in either group.ConclusionDuring SCV catheterization under US guidance in paediatric patients, the SC approach yielded a shorter puncture time and decreased the incidence of guidewire misplacement when compared with the IC approach.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01527175.
机译:背景技术经锁骨上(SC)或锁骨下(IC)引导的超声(US)引导的锁骨下静脉(SCV)导管可用于儿童。本研究的目的是比较这些方法的有效性。方法该前瞻性随机研究包括98名3岁以下的儿童,分为2组:SC组(n = 49)和IC组( n = 49)。所有SCV导管插入术均由US指导,并由一名经验丰富的麻醉师进行。分析了有关穿刺时间,尝试次数,成功的导丝插入,导管插入时间和并发症的数据。结果IC组的中位穿刺时间比SC组长(48 vs 36 s,P = 0.02)。与SC组相比,IC组更需要多次尝试(尝试次数> 3)(24.5 vs 6.1%,P = 0.01)。 IC组中导丝错位的发生率高于SC组[10(20.4%)vs 0(0%),P = 0.001]。所有患者均成功进行了导管插入术。两组均未发生气胸或动脉穿刺。结论在US指导下的小儿患者SCV导管插入术中,与IC法相比,SC法产生的穿刺时间更短,导丝错位的发生率也降低了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号