...
首页> 外文期刊>British journal of anaesthesia >Effects of an intraoperative infusion of 4% succinylated gelatine (Gelofusine) and 6% hydroxyethyl starch (Voluven) on blood volume.
【24h】

Effects of an intraoperative infusion of 4% succinylated gelatine (Gelofusine) and 6% hydroxyethyl starch (Voluven) on blood volume.

机译:术中输注4%琥珀酰明胶(Gelofusine)和6%羟乙基淀粉(Voluven)对血容量的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Editor-We read with interest the article comparing 4% succi-nylated gelatine and 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES) and its findings that 6% HES produced a statistically significant greater increase in serum chloride concentration suggesting a tendency to produce hyperchloraemic acidosis in comparison with 4% succinylated gelatine, while the blood-volume expanding effects were not significantly different.The type of colloid used in the resuscitation of critically ill patients has been debated by clinicians for many years. However, the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) Task Force have advised in March 2012 against the use of HES in patients with severe sepsis or risk of acute kidney injury.2 Furthermore, the Scandinavian Starch for Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock Trial (6S) has shown there to be an increased 90 day mortality and increased risk of acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy with 6% HES,3 and thus, we feel together with the results of the published article, there is now strong evidence to suggest we should not be using HES in critically ill patients.
机译:编辑我们感兴趣地阅读了比较4%的琥珀酰明胶和6%的羟乙基淀粉(HES)的文章,发现6%的HES产生了统计学上显着更大的血清氯化物浓度增加,表明与4%的琥珀酰明胶,但血容量增加效果无显着差异。用于重症患者复苏的胶体类型已被临床医生争论多年。但是,欧洲重症监护医学会(ESICM)工作队于2012年3月建议不要在严重脓毒症或有急性肾损伤风险的患者中使用HES。2此外,斯堪的纳维亚淀粉用于严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克试验( 6S)显示需要增加6%HES的肾脏替代治疗的90天死亡率和急性肾损伤风险增加,因此,我们认为与已发表文章的结果一起,现在有强有力的证据表明我们不应该在重症患者中使用HES。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号