首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >A Randomized Control Trial Comparing 2 Levofloxacin-Containing Second-Line Therapies for Helicobacter pylori Eradication
【24h】

A Randomized Control Trial Comparing 2 Levofloxacin-Containing Second-Line Therapies for Helicobacter pylori Eradication

机译:比较两种含左氧氟沙星的二线疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌的随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The of Trial Design.Lengthy exposure to quinolone-containing triple therapy in Helicobacter pylori eradication leads to the development of drug resistance. Sequential therapy with a quinolone and metronidazole -containing regimen appears to be an effective treatment option. This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the efficacy of 5-plus 5 days' levofloxacin and metronidazole-containing sequential therapy (EALM) with that of 10-day levofloxacin-containing triple therapy (EAL) in second-line H pylori eradication treatment.One hundred and sixty-four patients who had failed the H pylori eradication attempts using the standard triple therapy (proton pump inhibitor bid, clarithromycin 500mg bid, amoxicillin 1g bidx7 days) were randomly assigned to either an EALM therapy group (n=82; esomeprazole 40mg bid and amoxicillin 1g bid for 5 days, followed by esomeprazole 40mg bid, levofloxacin 500mg qd, and metronidazole 500mg tid, for 5 days) or a 10-day EAL therapy group (n=82; levofloxacin 500mg qd, amoxicillin 1g bid, and esomeprazole 40mg bid). One patient was lost to follow-up in each group. Follow-up for H pylori status was performed 4 to 8 weeks later.Eradication rates for the EALM and EAL groups were 90.2% (74/82, 95% confidence interval [CI]=83.7%-96.8%) and 80.5% (66/82, 95% CI=71.7%-89.2%, P=0.077) in the intention-to-treat analysis; and 91.4% (74/81, 95% CI=85.1%-97.6%) and 81.5% (66/81, 95% CI=72.8%-90.1%, P=0.067) in the per-protocol analysis. The adverse events for the EALM and EAL groups were 23.5% versus 11.1%, P=0.038 but were all very mild and were well tolerated except for 1 patient with poor compliance. The compliances were 98.8% and 100%, respectively, between the 2 groups. An antibiotic resistance to levofloxacin was the clinical factor influencing the efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapy in the EAL group, and dual resistance to levofloxacin and metronidazole in the EALM group.Levofloxacin and metronidazole-containing sequential therapy achieved a >90% eradication rate as a second-line H pylori therapy. Dual antibiotic resistance to levofloxacin and metronidazole was the clinical factor influencing the efficacy of H pylori eradication therapy in the sequential therapy (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02596620).
机译:试验设计的长期幽门螺杆菌根除暴露于含喹诺酮的三联疗法导致耐药性的发展。含喹诺酮和甲硝唑的方案序贯治疗似乎是一种有效的治疗选择。该随机对照试验旨在比较5天+5天左氧氟沙星和含甲硝唑的序贯疗法(EALM)与10天含左氧氟沙星的三联疗法(EAL)在根除H线的二线治疗中的疗效。 164例使用标准三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌失败的患者(质子泵抑制剂出价,克拉霉素500mg出价,阿莫西林1g出价x7天)被随机分配至EALM治疗组(n = 82;埃索美拉唑40mg出价和阿莫西林1g出价持续5天,然后是埃索美拉唑40mg出价,左氧氟沙星500mg qd和甲硝唑500mg tid,持续5天)或10天EAL治疗组(n = 82;左氧氟沙星500mg qd,阿莫西林1g出价和埃索美拉唑40mg bid)。每组中均丢失一名患者进行随访。幽门螺杆菌状态的随访在4至8周后进行。EALM和EAL组的根除率为90.2%(74 / 82,95%置信区间[CI] = 83.7%-96.8%)和80.5%(66) / 82,在意向分析中为95%CI = 71.7%-89.2%,P = 0.077);每种方案分析中分别为91.4%(74/81,95%CI = 85.1%-97.6%)和81.5%(66/81,95%CI = 72.8%-90.1%,P = 0.067)。 EALM和EAL组的不良事件分别为23.5%和11.1%,P = 0.038,但均非常轻微,并且耐受性良好,除了1名依从性差的患者。两组之间的依从性分别为98.8%和100%。 EAL组对左氧氟沙星的抗生素耐药性是影响幽门螺杆菌根除治疗效果的临床因素,而EALM组对左氧氟沙星和甲硝唑的双重耐药性是影响因素,左氧氟沙星和甲硝唑的序贯治疗根除率达到90%以上第二线幽门螺杆菌疗法。对左氧氟沙星和甲硝唑的双重抗生素耐药性是影响序贯治疗中幽门螺杆菌根除疗法疗效的临床因素(ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT02596620)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号