首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Cetuximab concurrent with IMRT versus cisplatin concurrent with IMRT in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective matched case-control study
【24h】

Cetuximab concurrent with IMRT versus cisplatin concurrent with IMRT in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective matched case-control study

机译:西妥昔单抗联合IMRT与顺铂联合IMRT在局部晚期鼻咽癌中的回顾性病例对照研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To evaluate the treatment efficacies and toxicities of concurrent cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy (BRT) or cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. :Patients with previously untreated locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma were matched into pairs, and enrolled into the study. All patients were given either BRT or CRT. Survival outcomes, toxicities, and prognostic factors were evaluated. :A total of 112 patients were enrolled. The 5-year overall survival was 79.3% and 79.5% in CRT and BRT arm, respectively (P = 0.797) and the 5-year DFS was 73.5% and 74.6%, respectively (P = 0.953). In toxicity analysis, CRT arm had more significant decrease in white blood cell, platelet, hemoglobin, and severe vomiting, while more severe skin reactions and mucositis were shown in BRT arm. :BRT was not less efficacious than traditional CRT. They lead to different aspects of toxicities. If patients cannot stand more severe toxicities caused by CRT, BRT could be an ideal alternative.
机译:评估同时进行的基于西妥昔单抗的生物放疗(BRT)或基于顺铂的放化疗(CRT)在局部晚期鼻咽癌中的治疗效果和毒性。 :将先前未经治疗的局部晚期鼻咽癌患者配对,并纳入研究。所有患者均接受了BRT或CRT。评估生存结果,毒性和预后因素。 :总共112例患者入组。 CRT和BRT组的5年总生存率分别为79.3%和79.5%(P = 0.797),5年DFS分别为73.5%和74.6%(P = 0.953)。在毒性分析中,CRT组白细胞,血小板,血红蛋白和严重呕吐的减少更为显着,而BRT组则表现出更严重的皮肤反应和粘膜炎。 :BRT的功效不亚于传统CRT。它们导致毒性的不同方面。如果患者不能忍受CRT引起的更严重的毒性反应,则BRT可能是理想的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号