...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Maximizing kidneys for transplantation using machine perfusion: from the past to the future: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Maximizing kidneys for transplantation using machine perfusion: from the past to the future: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:使用机器灌注使肾脏移植最大化:从​​过去到未来:全面的系统综述和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background:The two main options for renal allograft preservation are static cold storage (CS) and machine perfusion (MP). There has been considerably increased interest in MP preservation of kidneys, however conflicting evidence regarding its efficacy and associated costs have impacted its scale of clinical uptake. Additionally, there is no clear consensus regarding oxygenation, and hypo- or normothermia, in conjunction with MP, and its mechanisms of action are also debated. The primary aims of this article were to elucidate the benefits of MP preservation with and without oxygenation, and/or under normothermic conditions, when compared with CS prior to deceased donor kidney transplantation.Methods:Clinical (observational studies and prospective trials) and animal (experimental) articles exploring the use of renal MP were assessed (EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane databases). Meta-analyses were conducted for the comparisons between hypothermic MP (hypothermic machine perfusion [HMP]) and CS (human studies) and normothermic MP (warm (normothermic) perfusion [WP]) compared with CS or HMP (animal studies). The primary outcome was allograft function. Secondary outcomes included graft and patient survival, acute rejection and parameters of tubular, glomerular and endothelial function. Subgroup analyses were conducted in expanded criteria (ECD) and donation after circulatory (DCD) death donors.Results:A total of 101 studies (63 human and 38 animal) were included. There was a lower rate of delayed graft function in recipients with HMP donor grafts compared with CS kidneys (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.69-0.87). Primary nonfunction (PNF) was reduced in ECD kidneys preserved by HMP (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.09-0.89). Renal function in animal studies was significantly better in WP kidneys compared with both HMP (standardized mean difference [SMD] of peak creatinine 1.66; 95% CI 3.19 to 0.14) and CS (SMD of peak creatinine 1.72; 95% CI 3.09 to 0.34). MP improves renal preservation through the better maintenance of tubular, glomerular, and endothelial function and integrity.Conclusions:HMP improves short-term outcomes after renal transplantation, with a less clear effect in the longer-term. There is considerable room for modification of the process to assess whether superior outcomes can be achieved through oxygenation, perfusion fluid manipulation, and alteration of perfusion temperature. In particular, correlative experimental (animal) data provides strong support for more clinical trials investigating normothermic MP.
机译:背景:用于肾脏同种异体移植保存的两个主要选择是静态冷藏(CS)和机器灌注(MP)。人们对MP保留肾脏的兴趣大大增加,但是有关其功效和相关成本的相互矛盾的证据影响了其临床吸收规模。此外,关于氧合,体温过低或过低与MP并用尚无明确共识,并且其作用机理也存在争议。本文的主要目的是阐明与已故供体肾移植之前的CS相比,无论有无氧合和/或在常温条件下MP保存的益处。方法:临床(观察性研究和前瞻性试验)和动物(评估了探索使用肾脏MP的文章(EMBASE,Medline和Cochrane数据库)。与CS或HMP(动物研究)相比,进行了荟萃分析,以比较体温过低的MP(低温机器灌注[HMP])和CS(人体研究)和体温MP(热(正常)灌注[WP])之间的比较。主要结果是同种异体移植功能。次要结果包括移植物和患者的存活率,急性排斥反应以及肾小管,肾小球和内皮功能参数。在扩展标准(ECD)和循环死亡后捐献者(DCD)中进行亚组分析。结果:包括101个研究(63人和38动物)。与CS肾脏相比,接受HMP供体移植的受者延迟移植功能的发生率较低(RR 0.77; 95%CI 0.69-0.87)。 HMP保留的ECD肾脏的原发性无功能(PNF)降低(RR 0.28; 95%CI 0.09-0.89)。在动物研究中,与HMP(肌酐峰值1.66的标准均值[SMD]; 95%CI 3.19至0.14)和CS(肌酐峰值1.72的SMD; 95%CI 3.09至0.34)相比,WP肾脏的肾功能明显更好。 。 MP通过更好地维持肾小管,肾小球和内皮的功能和完整性来改善肾脏的保存。结论:HMP改善了肾移植后的短期预后,但长期效果较差。有很大的空间可以修改该过程,以评估是否可以通过充氧,灌注液操作和改变灌注温度来实现优异的结果。特别是,相关的实验(动物)数据为更多研究正常体温MP的临床试验提供了有力的支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号