...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >The Impact of Restricting Over-the-Counter Sales of Antimicrobial Drugs Preliminary Analysis of National Data
【24h】

The Impact of Restricting Over-the-Counter Sales of Antimicrobial Drugs Preliminary Analysis of National Data

机译:限制抗菌药物非处方药销售的影响国家数据初步分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

To describe the nationwide impact of a restrictive law on over-the-counter sales of antimicrobial drugs, implemented in Brazil in November 2010.Approximately 75% of the population receives healthcare from the public health system and receives free-of-charge medication if prescribed. Total sales in private pharmacies as compared with other channels of sales of oral antibiotics were evaluated in this observational study before and after the law (2008-2012). Defined daily dose per 1000 inhabitants per day (DDD/TID) was used as standard unit.In private pharmacies the effect of the restrictive law was statistically significant (P<0.001) with an estimated decrease in DDD/TID of 1.87 (s.e.= 0.18). In addition, the trend of DDD/TID before the restrictive law was greater than after the intervention (P<0.001). Before November 2010, the slope for the trend line was estimated as 0.08 (s.e.=0.01) whereas after the law, the estimated slope was 0.03 (s.e.=0.01). As for the nonprivate channels, no difference in sales was observed (P=0.643). The impact in the South and Southeast (more developed) regions was higher than in the North, Northeast, and Mid-West. The state capitals had a 19% decrease, compared with 0.8% increase in the rest of the states.Before the law, the sales of antimicrobial drugs were steadily increasing. From November 2010, with the restrictive law, there was an abrupt drop in sales followed by an increase albeit at a significantly lower rate. The impact was higher in regions with better socio-economic status.
机译:为描述限制性法律对抗菌药物的非处方药销售在全国范围的影响,该法律于2010年11月在巴西实施。大约75%的人口从公共卫生系统获得医疗保健,并根据处方获得免费药物。在这项观察性研究之前和之后(2008-2012年),评估了私人药房的总销售额与口服抗生素其他渠道的销售额。每1000名居民每天定义的日剂量(DDD / TID)被用作标准单位。在私人药房中,限制性法律的影响具有统计学意义(P <0.001),估计DDD / TID降低了1.87(se = 0.18) )。此外,限制性法律之前的DDD / TID趋势比干预后更大(P <0.001)。在2010年11月之前,趋势线的斜率估计为0.08(s.e. = 0.01),而在法律之后,估计斜率是0.03(s.e. = 0.01)。至于非私人渠道,没有观察到销售差异(P = 0.643)。南部和东南部(较发达)地区的影响要大于北部,东北部和中西部地区。州府的资本金减少了19%,而其他州的资本金增加了0.8%。在法律颁布之前,抗菌药物的销售一直在稳定增长。从2010年11月开始,随着限制性法律的出现,销售量突然下降,但随后却以显着较低的速度增长。在社会经济地位较好的地区影响更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号