...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical Physics >Experimental derivation of wall correction factors for ionization chambers used in high dose rate 192Ir source calibration.
【24h】

Experimental derivation of wall correction factors for ionization chambers used in high dose rate 192Ir source calibration.

机译:高剂量率192Ir源校准中使用的电离室壁校正因子的实验推导。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

At present there are no specific primary standards for 192Ir high dose rate sources used in brachytherapy. Traceability to primary standards is guaranteed through the method recommended by the AAPM that derives the air kerma calibration factor for the 192Ir gamma rays as the average of the air kerma calibration factors for x-rays and 137Cs gamma-rays or the Marechal et al. method that uses the energy-weighted air kerma calibration factors for 250 kV x rays and 60Co gamma rays as the air kerma calibration factor for the 192Ir gamma rays. In order to use these methods, it is necessary to use the same buildup cap for all energies and the appropriate wall correction factor for each chamber. This work describes experimental work used to derive the A(W) for four different ionization chambers and different buildup cap materials for the three energies involved in the Marechal et al. method. The A(W) for the two most common ionization chambers used in hospitals, the Farmer NE 2571 and PTW N30001 is 0.995 and 0.997, respectively, for 250 kV x rays, 0.982 and 0.985 for 192Ir gamma rays, and 0.979 and 0.991 for 60Co gamma rays, all for a PMMA build-up cap of 0.550 gm cm(-2). A comparison between the experimental values and Monte Carlo calculations shows an agreement better than 0.9%. Availability of the A(W) correction factors for all commercial chambers allows users of the in-air calibration jig, provided by the manufacturer, to alternatively use the Marechal et al. method. Calibration laboratories may also used this method for calibration of a well-type ionization chamber with a comparable accuracy to the AAPM method.
机译:目前,在近距离放射治疗中尚无针对192Ir高剂量率来源的特定主要标准。通过AAPM推荐的方法可保证溯源至主要标准,该方法将192Ir伽马射线的空气比释动能校准因子导出为X射线和137Cs伽马射线或Marechal等人的空气比释动能校准因子的平均值。该方法使用了250 kV x射线和60Co伽马射线的能量加权空气比释动能校准因子作为192Irγ射线的空气比释动能校准因子。为了使用这些方法,必须为所有能量使用相同的堆积帽,并为每个腔室使用适当的壁校正因子。这项工作描述了用于推导四个不同电离室的A(W)和Marechal等人涉及的三个能量的不同堆积帽材料的实验工作。方法。医院使用的两个最常见电离室的Farmer NE 2571和PTW N30001的A(W)对于250 kV x射线分别为0.995和0.997,对于192Irγ射线分别为0.982和0.985,对于60Co射线为0.979和0.991 γ射线,所有这些都适用于0.550 gm cm(-2)的PMMA堆积帽。实验值和蒙特卡洛计算值之间的比较表明一致性好于0.9%。所有商用舱室都有A(W)校正因子,这使得制造商提供的空中校准夹具的用户可以选择使用Marechal等人的产品。方法。校准实验室也可以使用该方法对井式电离室进行校准,其精度与AAPM方法相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号