首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Malignant retroperitoneal fibrosis: MRI characteristics in 50 patients
【24h】

Malignant retroperitoneal fibrosis: MRI characteristics in 50 patients

机译:恶性腹膜后纤维化:50例患者的MRI特征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We analyzed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) morphologic patterns of retroperitoneal fibrosis (RF) to identify those able to distinguish malignant RF (mRF) from idiopathic RF (iRF). This retrospective study concerned 50 consecutive patients with MRI-based RF diagnoses, 35 of whom also had histologically proven RF. Previous radiotherapy, abdominal or pelvic surgery or infection during the preceding 6 months, vascular aneurysm (aorta or iliac artery), presence of retroperitoneal multiple nodular masses, or enlarged lymph nodes with a diameter >15 mm constituted exclusion criteria.Patients with mRF differed from those with iRF by age, smoking habits, and follow-up duration but not by clinical manifestations, inflammatory syndrome, or renal insufficiency. MRI-documented mRF extension along the aorta, from above the renal arteries to below the aortic bifurcation, was more frequent than iRF (47% vs. 0%; p = 0.001) but less frequent between the renal arteries and the aortic bifurcation (18% vs. 50%; p = 0.04); mRF extension behind the aorta was wider than iRF (5.0 vs. 2.5 mm; p = 0.03). Neither urinary tract nor vessel involvement differed. Medial ureteral attraction was significantly less frequent in mRF than iRF (24% vs. 83%; p < 0.001), according to univariate and multivariate analyses. An algorithm based on the most discriminant criteria (RF extending from above the renal arteries to below the aortic bifurcation and the absence of medial ureteral attraction) for mRF diagnosis had 82% sensitivity and 83% specificity. When applied to the 15 iRF patients without histologic data, specificity was 73%.This mRF decision tree, consisting of the 2 most discriminant MRI criteria, could be used as a supplementary argument to support RF biopsy.
机译:我们分析了腹膜后纤维化(RF)的磁共振成像(MRI)形态学模式,以识别能够区分特发性RF(iRF)和恶性RF(mRF)的人。这项回顾性研究涉及50例连续的基于MRI的RF诊断患者,其中35例也具有组织学证实的RF。先前的放疗,前六个月的腹部或骨盆手术或感染,血管动脉瘤(主动脉或动脉),腹膜后多个结节性肿块或直径大于15 mm的淋巴结肿大是排除标准.mRF的患者与根据年龄,吸烟习惯和随访时间而患有iRF的患者,但不包括临床表现,炎性综合征或肾功能不全。 MRI记录的mRF沿主动脉从肾动脉上方延伸至主动脉分叉处的频率比iRF更为频繁(47%vs. 0%; p = 0.001),但在肾动脉与主动脉分叉之间的频率较低(18 %与50%; p = 0.04);主动脉后方的mRF延伸范围比iRF宽(5.0对2.5 mm; p = 0.03)。尿路和血管受累均无差异。根据单因素和多因素分析,在mRF中,输尿管内侧吸引的发生率明显低于iRF(24%比83%; p <0.001)。基于最判别标准(RF从肾动脉上方延伸至主动脉分叉以下且不存在输尿管内侧吸引)的算法用于mRF诊断的敏感性为82%,特异性为83%。当将15例无组织学资料的iRF患者应用时,特异性为73%。该mRF决策树由2个最有区别的MRI标准组成,可以作为辅助论据来支持RF活检。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号