...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Infections of cardiac implantable electronic devices: A retrospective multicenter observational study
【24h】

Infections of cardiac implantable electronic devices: A retrospective multicenter observational study

机译:心脏植入式电子设备的感染:一项回顾性多中心观察性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Infections of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) can cause significant morbidity, mortality, and financial burden. Although staphylococcal organisms account for most infections of these cardiac devices, approximately 20% of all CIED-related infections are caused by non-Staphylococcus species. Herein we describe and compare the demographics, clinical presentation, and outcomes of Staphylococcus aureus and non-staphylococcal infections of CIED.We performed a retrospective, multicenter, observational study of patients from 4 academic hospitals in Houston between 2002 and 2009. All 80 identified non-staphylococcal CIED-related infections were matched, at a 1:1 ratio, to S. aureus infections.Although the demographics and general comorbidities in the 2 study groups were relatively similar, the S. aureus group had a higher proportion of patients with coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, and end-stage renal disease. Additionally, 81% of S. aureus compared with only 48.5% of the non-staphylococcal CIED-related infections were health care-associated (p < 0.001). Furthermore, when compared to non-staphylococcal infections, the S. aureus group had more indwelling intravascular foreign material (p < 0.001), more rapid clinical progression (p < 0.001), and overall worse clinical presentation (p < 0.001). However, after stratifying by clinical presentation, the mortality rates in the 2 groups were similar (p = 0.45).Since approximately one-fifth of all CIED-related infections are caused by non-staphylococcal organisms, and untimely antibiotic treatment can result in serious complications, it may be prudent to broaden empiric antimicrobial therapy to cover both Gram-positive and -negative bacteria, until the causative organism is identified.
机译:心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)的感染会导致严重的发病率,死亡率和财务负担。尽管葡萄球菌是这些心脏设备的大多数感染原因,但所有与CIED相关的感染中约有20%是由非葡萄球菌引起的。本文描述并比较金黄色葡萄球菌和CIED的非葡萄球菌感染的人口统计学,临床表现和结局。我们对2002年至2009年间休斯敦4所学术医院的患者进行了回顾性,多中心,观察性研究。所有80例均未发现-葡萄球菌CIED相关感染与金黄色葡萄球菌感染的比例为1:1,尽管两个研究组的人口统计学和一般合并症相对相似,但金黄色葡萄球菌组的冠心病患者比例更高动脉疾病,糖尿病和终末期肾脏疾病。此外,与卫生保健相关的金黄色葡萄球菌为81%,而非葡萄球菌CIED相关的感染仅为48.5%(p <0.001)。此外,与非葡萄球菌感染相比,金黄色葡萄球菌组具有更多的留在血管内异物(p <0.001),更快速的临床进展(p <0.001)和整体较差的临床表现(p <0.001)。然而,按临床表现分层后,两组的死亡率相似(p = 0.45)。由于所有CIED相关感染中约有五分之一是由非葡萄球菌引起的,因此不及时进行抗生素治疗可能导致严重的感染。对于并发症,应谨慎地扩大经验性抗菌治疗以覆盖革兰氏阳性菌和阴性菌,直到发现致病菌为止。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号