...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block combined with sciatic nerve block as an anesthetic technique for hindfoot and ankle surgery A prospective, randomized noninferiority trial
【24h】

Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block combined with sciatic nerve block as an anesthetic technique for hindfoot and ankle surgery A prospective, randomized noninferiority trial

机译:引流管与股神经阻滞联合坐骨神经阻滞作为后足和踝关节手术的麻醉技术一项前瞻性,随机,非劣效性试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: A femoral nerve block (FNB) in combination with a sciatic nerve block (SNB) is commonly used for anesthesia and analgesia in patients undergoing hindfoot and ankle surgery. The effects of FNB on motor function, related fall risk, and rehabilitation are controversial. An adductor canal block (ACB) potentially spares motor fibers in the femoral nerve, but the comparative effect on hindfoot and ankle surgeries between the 2 approaches is not yet well defined. We hypothesized that compared to FNB, ACB would cause less weakness in the quadriceps and produce similar pain scores during and after the operation.
机译:背景:股骨神经阻滞(FNB)与坐骨神经阻滞(SNB)组合常用于接受后足和踝部手术的患者的麻醉和镇痛。 FNB对运动功能,相关跌倒风险和康复的影响是有争议的。内收管阻滞(ACB)可能会在股神经中保留运动纤维,但尚不能很好地确定这两种方法在后足和踝关节手术中的比较效果。我们假设,与FNB相比,ACB可使股四头肌无力更少,并且在手术中和手术后会产生相似的疼痛评分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号