首页> 外文期刊>Medical engineering & physics. >Comparison of algorithms to quantify muscle fatigue in upper limb muscles based on sEMG signals
【24h】

Comparison of algorithms to quantify muscle fatigue in upper limb muscles based on sEMG signals

机译:基于sEMG信号量化上肢肌肉疲劳的算法比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This work compared the performance of six different fatigue detection algorithms quantifying muscle fatigue based on electromyographic signals. Surface electromyography (sEMG) was obtained by an experiment from upper arm contractions at three different load levels from twelve volunteers. Fatigue detection algorithms mean frequency (MNF), spectral moments ratio (SMR), the wavelet method WIRM1551, sample entropy (SampEn), fuzzy approximate entropy (fApEn) and recurrence quantification analysis (RQA%DET) were calculated. The resulting fatigue signals were compared considering the disturbances incorporated in fatiguing situations as well as according to the possibility to differentiate the load levels based on the fatigue signals. Furthermore we investigated the influence of the electrode locations on the fatigue detection quality and whether an optimized channel set is reasonable. The results of the MNF, SMR, WIRM1551 and fApEn algorithms fell close together. Due to the small amount of subjects in this study significant differences could not be found. In terms of disturbances the SMR algorithm showed a slight tendency to out-perform the others. (C) 2016 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:这项工作比较了基于肌电信号定量肌肉疲劳的六种不同疲劳检测算法的性能。表面肌电图(sEMG)通过实验从十二名志愿者的三种不同负荷水平的上臂收缩中获得。计算了疲劳检测算法的平均频率(MNF),谱矩比(SMR),小波方法WIRM1551,样本熵(SampEn),模糊近似熵(fApEn)和递归量化分析(RQA%DET)。考虑疲劳条件下的干扰以及根据疲劳信号区分负载水平的可能性,对所得的疲劳信号进行比较。此外,我们研究了电极位置对疲劳检测质量的影响以及优化的通道设置是否合理。 MNF,SMR,WIRM1551和fApEn算法的结果非常接近。由于本研究中的受试者较少,因此未发现明显差异。在干扰方面,SMR算法表现出略优于其他算法的趋势。 (C)2016年IPEM。由Elsevier Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号