首页> 外文期刊>International journal of biomedical engineering and technology >A comparison of sEMG and MMG signal classification for automated muscle fatigue detection
【24h】

A comparison of sEMG and MMG signal classification for automated muscle fatigue detection

机译:SEMG和MMG信号分类对自动肌肉疲劳检测的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study compares the classification performance of both sEMG and MMG signal from fatiguing dynamic contraction of the biceps brachii. Commonly used statistical features are compared with a recently developed evolved pseudo-wavelet. Based on the literature, wavelet-based methods are a promising feature extraction technique for both types of signals (sEMG and MMG) during dynamic contractions. MMG results show that the evolved pseudo-wavelet improved the classification rate of muscle fatigue by 4.70 percentage points to 27.94 percentage points when compared to other standard wavelet functions, giving an average correct classification of 80.63%, with statistical significance (p < 0.05). For sEMG signals the evolved pseudo-wavelet improved the classification rate of muscle fatigue by 4.45 percentage points to 14.96 percentage points when compared to other standard wavelet functions (p < 0.05), giving an average correct classification of 87.90%. The comparison demonstrates that for both the sEMG and the MMG signal, the feature giving best classification results was the evolved pseudo-wavelet.
机译:该研究比较了SEMG和MMG信号的分类性能来自二头肌Brachii的疲劳动态收缩。将常用的统计特征与最近开发的演进伪小波进行比较。基于文献,基于小波的方法是动态收缩期间信号(SEMG和MMG)的有希望的特征提取技术。 MMG结果表明,与其他标准小波功能相比,进化的伪小波将肌肉疲劳的分类率降至27.94个百分点,平均正确分类为80.63%,统计学意义(P <0.05)。对于SEMG信号,与其他标准小波功能相比,进化的伪小波将肌肉疲劳的分类率降至14.96个百分点(P <0.05),平均正确分类为87.90%。比较表明,对于SEMG和MMG信号,给出最佳分类结果的特征是进化的伪小波。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号