首页> 外文期刊>Medical engineering & physics. >The frequency domain versus time domain methods for processing of intracranial pressure (ICP) signals.
【24h】

The frequency domain versus time domain methods for processing of intracranial pressure (ICP) signals.

机译:用于处理颅内压(ICP)信号的频域与时域方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two methods for analyzing intracranial pressure (ICP) waveforms were compared. The frequency domain (FD) method converts the signal from the time domain to the frequency domain by a fast Fourier transform (FFT), while the time domain (TD) method calculates peak-to-peak value of the pulse waveform directly from the time samples. First, the ICP signal was regenerated from the first harmonic of the FFT and compared against the time domain raw ICP signal. We found that the FD method may underestimate pulse amplitude if there is heart rate variability or a high harmonic distortion. Second, to explore the significance in a larger data set, differences between FD- and TD-derived pulse amplitudes were determined for a total of 50,978 6-s time windows of 79 head injury patients. The mean difference in pulse pressure amplitude was 2.9 mmHg for the 50,978 6-s time windows. Differences between TD- and FD-derived pulse amplitudes were >or= 2.0 mmHg in 58.8% of the 50,978 time windows. In about 33% of time windows FD amplitudes were <2 mmHg when TD amplitudes were >or= 4 mmHg, and vice versa. Hence, the TD method is superior to the FD method for calculation of pulse amplitudes. Nevertheless, in this material both the TD and FD methods revealed significantly elevated pulse amplitudes in head injury patients with bad outcome (i.e. Glasgow Outcome Score 1-3).
机译:比较了两种分析颅内压(ICP)波形的方法。频域(FD)方法通过快速傅立叶变换(FFT)将信号从时域转换到频域,而时域(TD)方法直接根据时间来计算脉冲波形的峰峰值样品。首先,从FFT的一次谐波中生成ICP信号,并将其与时域原始ICP信号进行比较。我们发现,如果存在心率变异性或高谐波失真,FD方法可能会低估脉搏幅度。其次,为了探索更大数据集中的意义,针对79位颅脑损伤患者的总计50,978 6秒时间窗,确定了FD和TD衍生的脉冲幅度之间的差异。在50,978个6秒时间窗口中,脉冲压力幅度的平均差为2.9 mmHg。在50,978个时间窗口中,有58.8%的TD和FD衍生的脉冲幅度之间的差异大于或等于2.0 mmHg。在大约33%的时间窗口中,当TD振幅>或= 4 mmHg时,FD振幅<2 mmHg,反之亦然。因此,在计算脉冲幅度时,TD方法优于FD方法。然而,在该材料中,TD和FD方法均显示出在具有不良结局的颅脑损伤患者中脉搏幅度显着升高(即格拉斯哥结果评分1-3)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号