...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical engineering & physics. >Comparison of simultaneous continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) signals from ICP sensors placed within the brain parenchyma and the epidural space.
【24h】

Comparison of simultaneous continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) signals from ICP sensors placed within the brain parenchyma and the epidural space.

机译:来自放置在脑实质和硬膜外腔内的ICP传感器的同时连续颅内压(ICP)信号的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Simultaneous continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) signals from two different ICP sensors (Codman ICP MicroSensor; Johnson & Johnson, Raynham, MA) placed within the brain parenchyma and the epidural space were compared in ten patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Comparisons were made at the single ICP wave level by determining differences in mean pressure, and pulse pressure amplitude (dP) and latency (dT, i.e. rise time). Differences for the parameters mean ICP, mean ICP wave amplitude and mean ICP wave latency were also determined during consecutive 6-s time windows. The ICP sensors located within the brain parenchyma and epidural space showed marked differences in mean pressure. On the contrary, there were minor differences between sensors in 8 of 10 patients regarding single wave pulse pressure amplitude (dP) and single wave latency (dT, i.e. rise time), and also with regard to the parameters mean ICP wave amplitude and mean ICP wave latency. The levels of mean ICP wave amplitudes used for predicting shunt response in iNPH patients were independent of sensor location in 9 of 10 patients. These results extend previous data that epidural ICP monitoring cannot be used to reliably determine mean ICP, however, epidural ICP monitoring is very useful for determining ICP waveform parameters such as pulse pressure amplitude (dP) and mean ICP wave amplitude. It is suggested that epidural ICP monitoring with determination of mean ICP wave amplitude can be used to predict shunt response in iNPH, though an ICP sensor designed for epidural ICP monitoring would be preferable.
机译:在十名患有特发性常压性脑积水(iNPH)的患者中,比较了来自放置在脑实质和硬膜外腔内的两个不同ICP传感器(Codman ICP MicroSensor; Johnson&Johnson,Johnson&Johnson,MA)的同时连续颅内压(ICP)信号。通过确定平均压力,脉冲压力幅度(dP)和等待时间(dT,即上升时间)的差异,在单个ICP波水平上进行比较。在连续的6秒时间窗口内,还确定了参数均值ICP,均值ICP波幅值和均值ICP波潜伏期的差异。位于脑实质和硬膜外腔内的ICP传感器显示平均压力存在明显差异。相反,每10名患者中有8名的传感器之间在单波脉冲压力幅度(dP)和单波潜伏期(dT,即上升时间)以及参数ICP振幅和ICP平均值方面存在细微差异波潜伏期。用于预测iNPH患者分流反应的平均ICP波幅度水平与10位患者中的9位传感器位置无关。这些结果扩展了以前的数据,即硬膜外ICP监测不能用于可靠地确定平均ICP,但是,硬膜外ICP监测对于确定ICP波形参数(例如脉压幅度(dP)和平均ICP波幅)非常有用。建议采用硬膜外ICP监测并确定平均ICP波幅,可用于预测iNPH中的分流响应,尽管为硬膜外ICP监测而设计的ICP传感器更为可取。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号