...
首页> 外文期刊>British journal of anaesthesia >Precision and accuracy of a new device (CNAPTM) for continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring: assessment during general anaesthesia.
【24h】

Precision and accuracy of a new device (CNAPTM) for continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring: assessment during general anaesthesia.

机译:用于连续无创动脉压监测的新设备(CNAPTM)的精确度:在全身麻醉期间进行评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Continuous non-invasive arterial pressure measured with CNAP (CNAP) has been shown to be superior to intermittent oscillometric measurements during procedural sedation and spinal anaesthesia. We assessed the performance of CNAP during general anaesthesia by analysis of agreement with invasive measurements of arterial pressure (AP). METHODS: Eighty-eight patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery, cardio-, or neurosurgery were included in the study. Systolic, diastolic, and mean AP measured by an intra-arterial catheter in the radial artery (IAP) were compared with those obtained by CNAP from the same arm. Data were analysed to determine the precision (i.e. measurement error) and accuracy (i.e. systematic error) of beat-to-beat CNAP values with respect to IAP. Also, we compared the frequency of fast changes in AP (FCAP) and hypotension (IOH) by both methods. RESULTS: CNAP precision of 4.5, 3.1, and 3.2 mm Hg (systolic, diastolic, and mean AP, respectively) was not significantly different from IAP precision, and CNAP accuracy was +6.7, -5.6, and -1.6 mm Hg. The frequency of AP pairs having a difference within the calculated limits of agreement was 81%, 64%, and 76% for systolic, diastolic, and mean AP, respectively. The calculated limits of agreement were +/-17.6, +/-11.4, and +/-12.0 mm, Hg, respectively. CNAP and IAP detected simultaneously to 82.1% FCAP and to 84.6% IOH. CONCLUSIONS: CNAP provides real-time estimates of arterial pressure comparable with those generated by an invasive intra-arterial catheter system during general anaesthesia.
机译:背景:在镇静和麻醉过程中,用CNAP(CNAP)进行连续无创动脉压测量已优于间歇示波法测量。我们通过分析与动脉压(AP)的侵入性测量的一致性来评估CNAP在全身麻醉期间的表现。方法:该研究包括88例接受择期腹部手术,心脏或神经外科手术的患者。将by动脉中的动脉内导管测量的收缩压,舒张压和平均AP与通过CNAP从同一只手臂获得的收缩压,舒张压和平均AP进行比较。分析数据以确定相对于IAP的逐拍CNAP值的精度(即测量误差)和精度(即系统误差)。此外,我们通过两种方法比较了AP(FCAP)和低血压(IOH)快速变化的频率。结果:CNAP的准确度分别为4.5、3.1和3.2 mm Hg(收缩压,舒张压和平均AP)与IAP的准确度无显着差异,CNAP的准确度为+ 6.7,-5.6和-1.6 mm Hg。在计算出的一致限度内,差异的AP对的频率对于收缩压,舒张压和平均AP分别为81%,64%和76%。所计算的一致极限分别为+/- 17.6,+ /-11.4和+/- 12.0 mm Hg。 CNAP和IAP同时检测到82.1%FCAP和84.6%IOH。结论:CNAP可提供与全身麻醉期间有创动脉内导管系统产生的实时估计相当的实时动脉压。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号