...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical Physics >Dosimetry validation of treatment room shielding design.
【24h】

Dosimetry validation of treatment room shielding design.

机译:治疗室屏蔽设计的剂量学验证。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) can lead to an increase in leakage radiation. The total number of monitor units (MUs) for IMRT is typically 2-5 times that for conventional treatments [the ratio of the two is used to derive the effective modulation scaling factor (MSFeff)]. Shielding calculations for IMRT can be done by applying the MSFeff to measured exposures under conservative conditions (standard beam setup 40 cm x 40 cm field, 45 degrees collimator angle) to account for the increased leakage. In this work, we verified this approach for two existing vaults housing a Siemens Primart 6 MV linac and a Varian 21Ex 10 MV linac. We measured the cumulative exposures at various locations around the vaults for typical IMRT cases and for the standard beam setup using the same MUs. For the standard beam setup, the IMRT gantry angles and eight equally spaced angles were used. Estimations of weekly exposures for IMRT were carried out using exposure rates measured under standard beam setup and the MSFeff averaged over 20 treatment cases. The accumulated exposures under realistic IMRT conditions were 30%-50% lower than the estimated values using equally spaced gantry angles except for two locations where the real IMRT leakage was higher than the estimated value by approximately 10%. Measurements using the same gantry angles yielded similar results. Our results indicate that it is adequate to use the MSFeff and previously measured exposures to estimate the leakage increase due to IMRT for an existing vault. Different approaches should be followed when considering primary or secondary barriers since the standard beam setup is overestimating the exposures behind primary barriers compared to IMRT. In such cases, a 10 cm x 10 cm field can be used for more accurate shielding evaluation.
机译:调强放射治疗(IMRT)可能导致泄漏辐射增加。 IMRT的监视单元(MU)总数通常是常规处理的2-5倍[两者之比用于得出有效的调制比例因子(MSFeff)]。通过将MSFeff应用于在保守条件下(标准光束设置为40 cm x 40 cm视场,准直器角度为45度)以测量增加的泄漏,可以对IMRT进行屏蔽计算。在这项工作中,我们为两个现有的保险库(采用Siemens Primart 6 MV直线加速器和Varian 21Ex 10 MV直线加速器)验证了这种方法。对于典型的IMRT案例和使用相同MU的标准光束设置,我们测量了保险库周围各个位置的累积曝光量。对于标准光束设置,使用了IMRT龙门角度和八个等距角度。使用标准光束设置下测得的曝光率对IMRT每周曝光量进行估算,并将20例治疗病例的MSFeff平均。在实际IMRT条件下,使用两个等距龙门角的累计曝光量比估算值低30%-50%,但实际IMRT泄漏量比估算值高约10%的两个位置除外。使用相同机架角度进行的测量得出相似的结果。我们的结果表明,使用MSFeff和先前测量的暴露量来估算现有Vault因IMRT造成的泄漏增加是足够的。考虑主要或次要壁垒时,应采用不同的方法,因为与IMRT相比,标准光束设置高估了主要壁垒后的曝光。在这种情况下,可以使用10 cm x 10 cm的视野进行更准确的屏蔽评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号