...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical Physics >Anatomy structure creation and editing using 3D implicit surfaces
【24h】

Anatomy structure creation and editing using 3D implicit surfaces

机译:使用3D隐式曲面创建和编辑解剖结构

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: To accurately reconstruct, and interactively reshape 3D anatomy structures' surfaces using small numbers of 2D contours drawn in the most visually informative views of 3D imagery. The innovation of this program is that the number of 2D contours can be very much smaller than the number of transverse sections, even for anatomy structures spanning many sections. This program can edit 3D structures from prior segmentations, including those from autosegmentation programs. The reconstruction and surface editing works with any image modality. Methods: Structures are represented by variational implicit surfaces defined by weighted sums of radial basis functions (RBFs). Such surfaces are smooth, continuous, and closed and can be reconstructed with RBFs optimally located to efficiently capture shape in any combination of transverse (T), sagittal (S), and coronal (C) views. The accuracy of implicit surface reconstructions was measured by comparisons with the corresponding expert-contoured surfaces in 103 prostate cancer radiotherapy plans. Editing a pre-existing surface is done by overdrawing its profiles in image views spanning the affected part of the structure, deleting an appropriate set of prior RBFs, and merging the remainder with the new edit contour RBFs. Two methods were devised to identify RBFs to be deleted based only on the geometry of the initial surface and the locations of the new RBFs. Results: Expert-contoured surfaces were compared with implicit surfaces reconstructed from them over varying numbers and combinations of T/S/C planes. Studies revealed that surface-surface agreement increases monotonically with increasing RBF-sample density, and that the rate of increase declines over the same range. These trends were observed for all surface agreement metrics and for all the organs studied-prostate, bladder, and rectum. In addition, S and C contours may convey more shape information than T views for CT studies in which the axial slice thickness is greater than the pixel size. Surface editing accuracy likewise improves with larger sampling densities, and the rate of improvement similarly declines over the same conditions. Conclusions: Implicit surfaces based on RBFs are accurate representations of anatomic structures and can be interactively generated or modified to correct segmentation errors. The number of input contours is typically smaller than the number of T contours spanned by the structure.
机译:目的:使用在3D影像的视觉效果最强的视图中绘制的少量2D轮廓,准确地重建3D解剖结构的表面并进行交互重塑。该程序的创新之处在于,即使对于跨越许多截面的解剖结构,二维轮廓的数量也可以比横截面的数量小得多。该程序可以编辑来自先前分段的3D结构,包括来自自动分段程序的3D结构。重建和曲面编辑可用于任何图像形式。方法:结构由径向基函数(RBF)的加权和定义的变化隐式曲面表示。这样的表面是光滑的,连续的和封闭的,并且可以使用最佳定位的RBF进行重构,以有效地捕获横向(T),矢状(S)和冠状(C)视图的任何形状。通过与103个前列腺癌放射治疗计划中的相应专家轮廓表面进行比较,来测量隐式表面重建的准确性。编辑预先存在的表面的方法是,在覆盖结构受影响部分的图像视图中覆盖其轮廓,删除适当的一组先前的RBF,然后将其余部分与新的编辑轮廓RBF合并。设计了两种方法来仅基于初始表面的几何形状和新RBF的位置来识别要删除的RBF。结果:将专家轮廓的曲面与在不同数量和T / S / C平面组合下从其重构的隐式曲面进行了比较。研究表明,表面-表面一致性随RBF样本密度的增加而单调增加,并且增加速率在相同范围内下降。对于所有表面一致性指标以及所研究的所有器官(前列腺,膀胱和直肠)均观察到了这些趋势。另外,对于CT研究而言,S和C轮廓可能比T视图传达更多的形状信息,在CT研究中,轴向切片厚度大于像素尺寸。表面编辑的准确性同样随着较大的采样密度而提高,并且在相同条件下,提高的速率类似地下降。结论:基于RBF的隐式表面是解剖结构的准确表示,可以交互生成或修改以纠正分割错误。输入轮廓的数量通常小于结构所跨越的T轮廓的数量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号