【24h】

Fixing the fatal flaw in emergency planning.

机译:修复紧急计划中的致命缺陷。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Meetings at four demonstration sites were held in places where all of the participants felt safe and comfortable. All of their contributions were valued — and treated as valuable. Complete records were kept of what was said, and ideas were compiled and shared; no ideas were eliminated or reinterpreted. Together, participants identified both potential problems and ways to address them.Out of this process, the groups created practical "issue sets" tailored for households, workplaces, schools and governments.3 They also created a manual for the engagement process to offer other communities a way to develop effective plans for the emergencies that are most likely to occur in their areas.
机译:在所有参与者都感到安全和舒适的地方,在四个示范地点举行了会议。他们的所有贡献都得到了重视,并被视为宝贵。完整记录了发言内容,并汇编和共享了想法;没有想法被消除或重新解释。参与者共同确定了潜在的问题和解决方法。在此过程中,这些小组创建了针对家庭,工作场所,学校和政府的实用“问题集”。3他们还为参与过程创建了手册,以向其他社区提供服务。为最有可能在其地区发生的紧急情况制定有效计划的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号