首页> 外文期刊>British journal of anaesthesia >Lung isolation in the morbidly obese patient: A comparison of a left-sided double-lumen tracheal tube with the Arndt ? wire-guided blocker
【24h】

Lung isolation in the morbidly obese patient: A comparison of a left-sided double-lumen tracheal tube with the Arndt ? wire-guided blocker

机译:病态肥胖患者的肺隔离:左侧双腔气管导管与Arndt的比较。导丝阻滞剂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Obese patients are at risk of complications during airway management including difficult tracheal intubation. There are no reports regarding the ease of intubation or efficiency of lung collapse with the use of lung isolation devices for the morbidly obese patient. We conducted a prospective, randomized study in morbidly obese patients undergoing one-lung ventilation. We compared the effectiveness and ease of placement of a left-sided double-lumen tube and the Arndt ? blocker.Methods Fifty adult patients undergoing thoracic surgery were randomly assigned to a double-lumen tracheal tube (DLT) or standard single-lumen tracheal tube and an Arndt ? blocker. The primary endpoint was to record the number of times the tube/devices were successfully positioned at the first attempt and the time spent to achieve optimal position as verified by fibreoptic bronchoscopy. A secondary outcome was the adequacy of lung collapse.Results For the left-sided DLT group, there were three intubation failures on the first attempt. This group required an alternative method with an airway exchange catheter technique to advance the DLT. In the single-lumen tracheal tube with an Arndt ? blocker group, there were two intubation failures on the first attempt. After lung isolation devices were placed, lung collapse was clinically comparable in both groups.Conclusions There is no overall advantage of one device over the other during intubation of the morbidly obese patient.
机译:背景技术肥胖患者在气道处理过程中有发生并发症的风险,包括气管插管困难。没有关于病态肥胖患者使用肺隔离装置的插管容易性或肺塌陷效率的报道。我们对接受单肺通气的病态肥胖患者进行了一项前瞻性随机研究。我们比较了左侧双腔管和Arndt?的有效性和放置方便性。方法将50例行胸外科手术的成年患者随机分配到双腔气管导管(DLT)或标准单腔气管导管和Arndt?阻止者。主要终点是记录在首次尝试中成功定位管/设备的次数,以及达到最佳位置所花费的时间,如纤维支气管镜检查所证实的。次要结果是肺塌陷是否足够。结果对于左侧DLT组,首次尝试有3次插管失败。该小组需要使用气道交换导管技术的替代方法来推进DLT。在带Arndt的单腔气管导管中?阻断剂组,第一次尝试有两次插管失败。放置肺隔离装置后,两组的肺塌陷在临床上都是可比的。结论在病态肥胖患者的插管过程中,一个装置比另一个装置没有总体优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号