...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing: Journal of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering >Principal component analysis and cluster analysis for measuring the local organisation of human atrial fibrillation.
【24h】

Principal component analysis and cluster analysis for measuring the local organisation of human atrial fibrillation.

机译:主成分分析和聚类分析用于测量人体心房颤动的局部组织。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The distribution of atrial electrogram types has been proposed to characterise human atrial fibrillation. The aim of this study was to provide computer procedures for evaluating the local organisation of intracardiac recordings during AF as an alternative to off-line manual classification. Principal component analysis (PCA) reduced the data set to a few representative activations, and cluster analysis (CA) measured the average dissimilarity between consecutive activations of an intracardiac signal. The data set consisted of 106 bipolar signals recorded on 11 patients during electrophysiological studies for catheter ablation. Performances of PCA and CA in distinguishing between organised (type I) and disorganised (type II/III, Wells criteria) were assessed, in comparison with manual reading, by evaluating the predictive parameters of the classification analysis. Both methods gave high accuracy (92% for PCA and 89% for CA), confirming the feasibility of on-line characterisation of AF. Sensitivity was lower than specificity (81% against 98% for PCA, and 77% against 97% for CA), with seven out of eight misclassifications of PCA in common with CA. Differences between manual and computer analysis may be related to the higher resolution of PCA and CA in the measurement of the organisation of atrial activations. These procedures are suitable for providing automatic (by CA) or semi-automatic (by PCA) measures of the extent of local organisation of AF in the pre-ablation treatment phase.
机译:已经提出了心房电描记图类型的分布来表征人心房颤动。这项研究的目的是提供一种计算机程序,用于评估房颤期间心内膜记录的局部组织,以作为离线人工分类的替代方法。主成分分析(PCA)将数据集减少为几个代表性的激活,而聚类分析(CA)测量了心脏内信号连续激活之间的平均差异。数据集由在电生理研究期间为11例患者消融的106个双极信号记录,用于导管消融。通过评估分类分析的预测参数,与手动阅读相比,评估了PCA和CA在区分有组织的(I型)和无组织的(II / III型,Wells标准)方面的性能。两种方法均具有很高的准确性(PCA为92%,CA为89%),证实了AF在线表征的可行性。敏感性低于特异性(PCA为81%,相对于98%,CA为77%,相对于97%),PCA与PC常见的八种误分类中有七种。手动和计算机分析之间的差异可能与PCA和CA在心房激活组织测量中的较高分辨率有关。这些程序适用于在消融前治疗阶段自动(通过CA)或半自动(通过PCA)提供对AF局部组织程度的测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号