首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Preparing medical students for future learning using basic science instruction
【24h】

Preparing medical students for future learning using basic science instruction

机译:使用基础科学教学为医学生做好未来学习的准备

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives: The construct of 'preparation for future learning' (PFL) is understood as the ability to learn new information from available resources, relate new learning to past experiences and demonstrate innovation and flexibility in problem solving. Preparation for future learning has been proposed as a key competence of adaptive expertise. There is a need for educators to ensure that opportunities are provided for students to develop PFL ability and that assessments accurately measure the development of this form of competence. The objective of this research was to compare the relative impacts of basic science instruction and clinically focused instruction on performance on a PFL assessment (PFLA). Methods: This study employed a 'double transfer' design. Fifty-one pre-clerkship students were randomly assigned to either basic science instruction or clinically focused instruction to learn four categories of disease. After completing an initial assessment on the learned material, all participants received clinically focused instruction for four novel diseases and completed a PFLA. The data from the initial assessment and the PFLA were submitted to independent-sample t-tests. Results: Mean ± standard deviation [SD] scores on the diagnostic cases in the initial assessment were similar for participants in the basic science (0.65 ± 0.11) and clinical learning (0.62 ± 0.11) conditions. The difference was not significant (t[42] = 0.90, p = 0.37, d = 0.27). Analysis of the diagnostic cases on the PFLA revealed significantly higher mean ± SD scores for participants in the basic science learning condition (0.72 ± 0.14) compared with those in the clinical learning condition (0.63 ± 0.15) (t[42] = 2.02, p = 0.05, d = 0.62). Conclusions: Our results show that the inclusion of basic science instruction enhanced the learning of novel related content. We discuss this finding within the broader context of research on basic science instruction, development of adaptive expertise and assessment in medical education.
机译:目标:“为将来的学习做准备”(PFL)的构建被理解为具有以下能力:从可用资源中学习新信息,将新学习与过去的经验联系起来,并展示解决问题的创新能力和灵活性。已经提出了为将来的学习做准备作为适应性专业知识的关键能力。教育工作者需要确保为学生提供发展PFL能力的机会,并确保评估能够准确地衡量这种能力形式的发展。这项研究的目的是比较基础科学教学和临床重点教学对PFL评估(PFLA)表现的相对影响。方法:本研究采用“双转移”设计。 51名预科学生被随机分配到基础科学教学或以临床为重点的教学中,以学习四种疾病。在完成对所学材料的初步评估后,所有参与者均接受了针对四种新型疾病的临床重点指导,并完成了PFLA。来自初始评估和PFLA的数据已提交给独立样本t检验。结果:在基础科学(0.65±0.11)和临床学习(0.62±0.11)条件下,初诊诊断病例的平均±标准差[SD]得分相似。差异不显着(t [42] = 0.90,p = 0.37,d = 0.27)。通过对PFLA的诊断病例​​进行分析,发现与基础学习条件下参与者的平均±SD得分(0.72±0.14)相比,临床学习条件下参与者的平均±SD得分(0.63±0.15)明显更高(t [42] = 2.02,p = 0.05,d = 0.62)。结论:我们的结果表明,将基础科学教学纳入其中可以增强对新颖相关内容的学习。我们将在基础科学教学,适应性专业知识的发展和医学教育评估的更广泛研究范围内讨论这一发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号