首页> 外文期刊>Medical dosimetry: official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists >Comparison of whole-field simultaneous integrated boost VMAT and IMRT in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer
【24h】

Comparison of whole-field simultaneous integrated boost VMAT and IMRT in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer

机译:全场同时联合升压VMAT和IMRT治疗鼻咽癌的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

To study the feasibility of using volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to deliver whole-field simultaneous integrated boost (WF-SIB) to treat patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC).WF-SIB intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans, one-arc WF-SIB VMAT plans, and two-arc WF-SIB VMAT plans were generated with identical objective functions for 8 patients with NPC of various stages. Isodose distributions and dose-volume histograms were evaluated. Dosimetric and biological quality indices of clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were calculated to study the optimization capability of these 3 modalities in the treatment of patients with NPC. The optimization time, delivery time, required monitor units (MUs), and delivery accuracy were also compared to investigate the feasibility of these 3 modalities.There was no significant difference (p = 0.92) in target coverage (TC) between WF-SIB IMRT (99.00 ± 0.79) and two-arc WF-SIB VMAT (97.98 ± 1.29). However, both had higher TC than one-arc VMAT plans (89.92 ± 6.32, p 0.01). IMRT demonstrated the best protection of the spinal cord, whereas two-arc VMAT showed the minimum Dmax to OARs. No other significant differences were observed among these 3 modalities on CTV coverage and OAR sparing. The delivery and MU efficiency of one-arc and two-arc WF-SIB VMAT were greatly improved compared with WF-SIB IMRT. The optimization time of one-arc and two-arc WF-SIB VMAT plans were 5 and 10 times greater than that of WF-SIB IMRT, respectively. The delivery accuracy of WF-SIB VMAT was not affected by the increased freedom.For patients with NPC, one-arc WF-SIB VMAT might not be able to achieve sufficient TC, whereas two-arc WF-SIB VMAT was able to achieve reasonable TC. No significant advantage on OAR protection was demonstrated by VMAT compared with IMRT. WF-SIB VMAT has significantly shorter delivery times, but WF-SIB IMRT may still be the first treatment choice for patients with NPC.
机译:为了研究使用容积调制弧光疗法(VMAT)进行全场同时联合增强(WF-SIB)治疗鼻咽癌(NPC)患者的可行性.WF-SIB强度调制放射疗法(IMRT)计划,一项为8位不同阶段的NPC患者生成了具有相同目标功能的-arc WF-SIB VMAT计划和两弧WF-SIB VMAT计划。评估了等剂量分布和剂量-体积直方图。计算了临床目标量(CTV)和危险器官(OARs)的剂量和生物学质量指数,以研究这三种方式在治疗NPC中的优化能力。还比较了优化时间,交付时间,所需的监视单位(MU)和交付准确性,以研究这三种方式的可行性.WF-SIB IMRT的目标覆盖率(TC)没有显着差异(p = 0.92) (99.00±0.79)和两弧WF-SIB VMAT(97.98±1.29)。但是,两者的TC均高于一弧VMAT计划(89.92±6.32,p <0.01)。 IMRT显示出对脊髓的最佳保护,而两弧形VMAT显示出OAR的最小Dmax。这三种方式在CTV覆盖率和OAR保留上没有发现其他显着差异。与WF-SIB IMRT相比,一弧和两弧WF-SIB VMAT的传递和MU效率大大提高。一弧和两弧WF-SIB VMAT计划的优化时间分别是WF-SIB IMRT的优化时间的5倍和10倍。 WF-SIB VMAT的传递准确性不受自由度增加的影响。对于NPC患者,一弧WF-SIB VMAT可能无法获得足够的TC,而二弧WF-SIB VMAT则能够获得合理的TC。 TC。与IMRT相比,VMAT没有显示出对OAR保护的显着优势。 WF-SIB VMAT的分娩时间明显缩短,但是WF-SIB IMRT仍可能是NPC患者的首选治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号