...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer control : >Single-Institute Clinical Experiences Using Whole-Field Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Sequential IMRT in Postoperative Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer (OCC)
【24h】

Single-Institute Clinical Experiences Using Whole-Field Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Sequential IMRT in Postoperative Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer (OCC)

机译:单级临床经验,使用全场同时集成促进(SIB)强度调节放疗(IMRT)和口腔腔内术后术后的顺序IMRT(OCC)

获取原文

摘要

This study aimed to review clinical experiences using whole-field simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and sequential IMRT in postoperative patients with oral cavity cancer (OCC). From November 2006 to December 2014, a total of 182 postoperative patients with OCC who underwent either SIB-IMRT (n = 63) or sequential IMRT (n = 119) were enrolled retrospectively and matched randomly according to multiple risk factors by a computer. The differences were well balanced after patient matching (P = .38). The median follow-up time was 65 months. For patients treated with the SIB technique and the sequential technique, the respective mortality rates were 36.8% and 20.0% (P = .04). The primary recurrence rates were 26.3% and 10.0% (P = .02), respectively. The respective marginal failure rates were 26.7% and 16.7%. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients who received the SIB technique had a 2.74 times higher risk of death than those who received the sequential technique (95% confidence interval = 1.10-6.79, P = .03). Sequential IMRT provided a significantly lower dose to the esophagus (5.2 Gy, P = .02) and trachea (4.6 Gy, P = .03) than SIB-IMRT. For patients with locally advanced OCC, postoperative sequential IMRT may overcome an unpredictable geographic miss, potentially with a lower marginal failure rate in the primary area. Patients treated by sequential IMRT show equal overall survival benefits to those treated by SIB-IMRT and a lower mortality rate than those treated by SIB-IMRT. Additionally, a reduced dose to the esophagus and trachea compared to sequential IMRT was noted.
机译:本研究旨在通过口腔癌(OCC)的术后患者(OCC)在术后患者中使用全场同时集成升压(SIB)强度调节的放疗(IMRT)和顺序IMRT进行临床经验。从2006年11月到2014年12月,通过计算机回顾性地,共注册了182名患有SIB-IMRT(n = 63)或顺序IMRT(n = 119)的OCC的术后患者。患者匹配后,差异良好平衡(P = .38)。中位后续时间为65个月。对于用SIB技术和顺序技术治疗的患者,各自的死亡率为36.8%和20.0%(P = .04)。初级复发率分别为26.3%和10.0%(P = .02)。各自的边际失败率为26.7%和16.7%。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,接受SIB技术的患者比接受顺序技术的死亡风险更高的2.74倍(95%置信区间= 1.10-6.79,p = .03)。顺序IMRT为食道(5.2Gy,P = .02)和气管(4.6 Gy,P = .03)提供了显着更低的剂量。比SIB-IMRT为单位。对于局部晚期OCC的患者来说,术后顺序IMRT可能会克服不可预测的地理缺失,可能在主要区域中具有较低的边际故障率。通过顺序IMRT治疗的患者对SIB-IMRT治疗的那些效果相同的总存活效果,以及比SIB-IMRT治疗的死亡率较低。另外,注意到与顺序IMRT相比食管和气管的减少剂量。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号