首页> 外文期刊>Medical dosimetry: official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists >A study on planning organ at risk volume for the rectum using cone beam computed tomography in the treatment of prostate cancer
【24h】

A study on planning organ at risk volume for the rectum using cone beam computed tomography in the treatment of prostate cancer

机译:锥束计算机断层摄影术治疗直肠癌的风险器官规划计划的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this study, we analyzed planning organ at risk volume (PRV) for the rectum using a series of cone beam computed tomographies (CBCTs) acquired during the treatment of prostate cancer and evaluated the dosimetric effect of different PRV definitions. Overall, 21 patients with prostate cancer were treated radically with 78Gy in 39 fractions had in total 418 CBCTs, each acquired at the end of the first 5 fractions and then every alternate fraction. The PRV was generated from the Boolean sum volume of the rectum obtained from first 5 fractions (PRV-CBCT-5) and from all CBCTs (PRV-CBCT-All). The PRV margin was compared at the superior, middle, and inferior slices of the contoured rectum to compare PRV-CBCT-5 and PRV-CBCT-All. We also compared the dose received by the planned rectum (Rectum-computed tomography [CT]), PRV-CBCT-5, PRV-CBCT-All, and average rectum (CBCT-AV-dose-volume histogram [DVH]) at critical dose levels. The average measured rectal volume for all 21 patients for Rectum-CT, PRV-CBCT-5, and PRV-CBCT-All was 44.3 ± 15.0, 92.8 ± 40.40, and 121.5 ± 36.7cm3, respectively. For PRV-CBCT-All, the mean ± standard deviation displacement in the anterior, posterior, right, and left lateral directions in centimeters was 2.1 ± 1.1, 0.9 ± 0.5, 0.9 ± 0.8, and 1.1 ± 0.7 for the superior rectum; 0.8 ± 0.5, 1.1 ± 0.5, 1.0 ± 0.5, and 1.0 ± 0.5 for the middle rectum; and 0.3 ± 0.3; 0.9 ± 0.5; 0.4 ± 0.2, and 0.5 ± 0.3 for the inferior rectum, respectively. The first 5 CBCTs did not predict the PRV for individual patients. Our study shows that the PRV margin is different for superior, middle, and the inferior parts of the rectum, it is wider superiorly and narrower inferiorly. A uniform PRV margin does not represent the actual rectal variations during treatment for all treatment fractions. The large variation in interpatient rectal size implies a potential role for adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
机译:在这项研究中,我们使用在治疗前列腺癌期间获得的一系列锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)分析了直肠的风险器官(PRV)计划,并评估了不同PRV定义的剂量学效果。总体而言,对21例前列腺癌患者进行了39G的78Gy彻底治疗,共418次CBCT,每一次均在前5个分级结束时获得,然后每个替代等级进行。 PRV是从前5个部分(PRV-CBCT-5)和所有CBCT(PRV-CBCT-All)获得的直肠布尔总体积生成的。在轮廓直肠的上,中和下切片处比较PRV边缘,以比较PRV-CBCT-5和PRV-CBCT-All。我们还比较了在临界状态下计划直肠(直肠计算机断层扫描[CT]),PRV-CBCT-5,PRV-CBCT-All和平均直肠(CBCT-AV-剂量-体积直方图[DVH])所接受的剂量剂量水平。所有21例Rectum-CT,PRV-CBCT-5和PRV-CBCT-All的平均直肠容积分别为44.3±15.0、92.8±40.40和121.5±36.7cm3。对于PRV-CBCT-All,上直肠的前,后,右和左横向的平均±标准偏差位移为2.1±1.1、0.9±0.5、0.9±0.8和1.1±0.7;直肠中部为0.8±0.5、1.1±0.5、1.0±0.5和1.0±0.5;和0.3±0.3; 0.9±0.5;下直肠分别为0.4±0.2和0.5±0.3。前5个CBCT不能预测个别患者的PRV。我们的研究表明,PRV边缘在直肠的上,中和下部分是不同的,它的上端较宽而下端较窄。统一的PRV幅度并不代表所有治疗分数在治疗期间的实际直肠变化。患者间直肠大小的巨大差异暗示了适应性放射治疗对前列腺癌的潜在作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号