首页> 外文期刊>Medical dosimetry: official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists >A comparison of small-field tissue phantom ratio data generation methods for an Elekta Agility 6 MV photon beam
【24h】

A comparison of small-field tissue phantom ratio data generation methods for an Elekta Agility 6 MV photon beam

机译:Elekta Agility 6 MV光子束小视野组织幻影比数据生成方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Tissue-phantom ratios (TPRs) are a common dosimetric quantity used to describe the change in dose with depth in tissue. These can be challenging and time consuming to measure. The conversion of percentage depth dose (PDD) data using standard formulae is widely employed as an alternative method in generating TPR. However, the applicability of these formulae for small fields has been questioned in the literature. Functional representation has also been proposed for small-field TPR production. This article compares measured TPR data for small 6 MV photon fields against that generated by conversion of PDD using standard formulae to assess the efficacy of the conversion data. By functionally fitting the measured TPR data for square fields greater than 4cm in length, the TPR curves for smaller fields are generated and compared with measurements. TPRs and PDDs were measured in a water tank for a range of square field sizes. The PDDs were converted to TPRs using standard formulae. TPRs for fields of 4 × 4cm2 and larger were used to create functional fits. The parameterization coefficients were used to construct extrapolated TPR curves for 1 × 1 cm2, 2 × 2-cm2, and 3 × 3-cm2 fields. The TPR data generated using standard formulae were in excellent agreement with direct TPR measurements. The TPR data for 1 × 1-cm2, 2 × 2-cm2, and 3 × 3-cm2 fields created by extrapolation of the larger field functional fits gave inaccurate initial results. The corresponding mean differences for the 3 fields were 4.0%, 2.0%, and 0.9%. Generation of TPR data using a standard PDD-conversion methodology has been shown to give good agreement with our directly measured data for small fields. However, extrapolation of TPR data using the functional fit to fields of 4 × 4cm2 or larger resulted in generation of TPR curves that did not compare well with the measured data.
机译:组织-体模比(TPR)是用于描述剂量随组织深度的变化的常见剂量。这些可能具有挑战性,并且很耗时。使用标准公式转换深度百分比剂量(PDD)数据已广泛用作生成TPR的替代方法。但是,这些公式在小领域的适用性在文献中受到质疑。还提出了用于小规模TPR生产的功能表示。本文将使用标准公式评估6 MV小光子场的TPR数据与通过PDD转换产生的TPR数据进行了比较,以评估转换数据的功效。通过在功能上拟合长度大于4cm的正方形场的TPR数据,可以生成较小场的TPR曲线并将其与测量结果进行比较。在水箱中测量一系列正方形场大小的TPR和PDD。使用标准公式将PDD转换为TPR。用于4×4cm2及更大区域的TPR用于创建功能拟合。参数化系数用于构建1×1 cm2、2×2-cm2和3×3-cm2场的外推TPR曲线。使用标准公式生成的TPR数据与直接TPR测量非常吻合。通过外推较大的场函数拟合创建的1×1-cm2、2×2-cm2和3×3-cm2场的TPR数据给出的初始结果不准确。 3个字段的相应平均差异为4.0%,2.0%和0.9%。使用标准PDD转换方法生成TPR数据已显示出与我们在小范围内直接测量的数据具有很好的一致性。但是,使用功能拟合将TPR数据外推到4×4cm2或更大的区域会导致生成TPR曲线,而TPR曲线与测量数据不能很好地比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号