首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Techniques for teaching electrocardiogram interpretation: self-directed learning is less effective than a workshop or lecture.
【24h】

Techniques for teaching electrocardiogram interpretation: self-directed learning is less effective than a workshop or lecture.

机译:心电图解释教学技术:自主学习比研讨会或讲座效果差。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: Teaching 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation to students and residents is a challenge for medical educators. To date, few studies have compared the effectiveness of different techniques used for ECG teaching. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine if common teaching techniques, such as those involving workshops, lectures and self-directed learning (SDL), increase medical students' ability to correctly interpret ECGs. It also aimed to compare the effectiveness of these formats. METHODS: This was a prospective randomised study conducted over a 28-month period. Year 4 medical students were randomised to receive teaching in ECG interpretation using one of three teaching formats: workshop, lecture or SDL. All three formats covered the same content. Students were administered three tests: a pre-test (before teaching); a post-test (immediately after teaching), and a retention test (1 week after teaching). Each tested the same content using 25 questions worth 1 point each. A mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of variance (anova) with least squares post hoc analysis was conducted to determine if differences in test scores between the formats were statistically significant. RESULTS: Of the 223 students for whom data were analysed, 79 were randomised to a workshop, 82 to a lecture-based format and 62 to SDL. All three teaching formats resulted in a statistically significant improvement in individual test scores (p < 0.001). Comparison of the lecture- and workshop-based formats demonstrated no difference in test scores (marginal mean [MM] for both formats = 12.4, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 11.7-13.2]; p = 0.99). Test scores of students using SDL (MM = 10.7, 95% CI 9.8-11.5) were lower than those of students in the workshop (p = 0.003) and lecture (p = 0.002) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with those taught using workshop- and lecture-based formats, medical students learning ECG interpretation by SDL had lower test scores.
机译:背景:向学生和居民讲授12导联心电图(ECG)解释对医学教育者是一个挑战。迄今为止,很少有研究比较过用于ECG教学的不同技术的有效性。目的:本研究旨在确定常见的教学技术,例如涉及研讨会,讲座和自主学习(SDL)的教学技术,是否会增加医学生正确解释心电图的能力。它还旨在比较这些格式的有效性。方法:这是一项为期28个月的前瞻性随机研究。 4年级医学生被随机分配为接受以下三种教学形式之一的心电图解释教学:研讨会,讲座或SDL。这三种格式都覆盖相同的内容。对学生进行了三项测试:预测试(教学之前);后测(教学后立即进行)和保留测试(教学后1周)。每个人使用25个问题,每个问题1分,测试了相同的内容。进行了混合模型重复测量方差(方差分析)和事后分析的最小二乘法,以确定格式之间的测试分数差异是否在统计上显着。结果:在分析了223名学生的数据中,有79名被随机分配到讲习班,有82名以演讲为基础,而62名则是SDL。所有这三种教学形式均导致个人考试成绩在统计学上有显着提高(p <0.001)。对基于演讲和基于研讨会的格式的比较显示,考试成绩没有差异(两种格式的边际均值[MM] = 12.4,95%置信区间[95%CI] 11.7-13.2]; p = 0.99)。使用SDL的学生的考试成绩(MM = 10.7,95%CI 9.8-11.5)低于工作坊(p = 0.003)和演讲(p = 0.002)组的学生。结论:与使用基于讲习班和讲座的形式进行授课的学生相比,通过SDL学习ECG解释的医学生的考试分数较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号