首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Problem-based learning: a place in the sun for radiology.
【24h】

Problem-based learning: a place in the sun for radiology.

机译:基于问题的学习:放射学在阳光下的一席之地。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Context and setting Our Faculty of Medicine had been running a traditional, 5-year undergraduate medical curriculum since 1924. In 2003, the school changed its curriculum to adopt a SPICES (Student-centred, Problem-based learning [PBL], Integrated, Community-based, Electives and Systematic) model. Radiology was integrated into all courses throughout the programme. Why the idea was necessary There are 20 radiologists in our country, serving a population of 26 million people. There is thus a great need for doctors who are able to interpret their own radiographic investigations. For this reason, undergraduate basic radiology training in the new PBL curriculum was considered essential. What was done The cardio-respiratory course in the first year of study was identified as a suitable place in the programme to initiate basic radiological anatomy learning. The learning outcomes, content and cases were modified appropriately and relevant radiographic material for the cases were prepared. Students attended 2 small-group sessions in which the normal anatomy of chest radiographs was discussed and demonstrated in an interactive manner. These sessions were facilitated by a radiologist and supplemented the interpretation of chest radiographs in the PBL cases. Emphasis was put on chest radiography as this is the most common radiological investigation in clinical practice in developing countries. The educational impact of this learning strategy was evaluated by determining the ability of Year 1 and final year students in the identification of normal radiological anatomy visible on a chest radiograph. Unlike the Year 1 students, the final year students had been taught radiology in the traditional programme (discontinued in 2003) in large classroom lectures. Student and tutor satisfaction was assessed after the course using a self-administered questionnaire scored on a Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree).
机译:背景和背景自1924年以来,我们的医学院一直在运行传统的5年制本科医学课程。2003年,学校改变了课程设置,采用了SPICES(以学生为中心,基于问题的学习[PBL],综合,社区,选修课和系统课程)。在整个计划中,放射学已纳入所有课程。为什么需要这个主意我国有20名放射科医生,为2600万人提供服务。因此,非常需要能够解释自己的射线照相检查的医生。因此,在新的PBL课程中,对本科生进行放射学基础培训是必不可少的。完成的工作在研究的第一年,心肺课程被确定为计划中开展基础放射学解剖学学习的合适位置。适当地修改了学习成果,内容和案例,并为案例准备了相关的射线照相材料。学生参加了2个小组会议,以互动的方式讨论并演示了胸部X光片的正常解剖结构。这些会议由放射科医生协助进行,并补充了PBL病例中胸部X光片的解释。重点放在胸片上,因为这是发展中国家临床实践中最常见的放射学检查。通过确定一年级和最后一年的学生确定胸部X光片上可见的正常放射解剖学的能力,评估了这种学习策略的教育影响。与一年级的学生不同,最后一年级的学生在大型教室里的传统课程中接受了放射学的教学(2003年停产)。课程结束后,使用利克特量表(1 =完全不同意5 =完全同意)对自我调查问卷进行评分,评估学生和导师的满意度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号