首页> 外文期刊>Medical decision making: An international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making >Comment on Petrou and Kupek: use unadjusted HUI3 scores, not adjusted disutilities.
【24h】

Comment on Petrou and Kupek: use unadjusted HUI3 scores, not adjusted disutilities.

机译:对Petrou和Kupek的评论:使用未经调整的HUI3得分,而不是未经调整的实用程序。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the May/June 2009 issue of Medical Decision Making, Petrou and Kupek report preference-based quality-of-life (QALY) weights for a wide range of disabilities and severe illnesses in children. QALY weights have not previously been available for many of these conditions. The weights were developed by first asking the principal caregiver of each child to report the child's health status and quality of life using the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3). After deriving HUI3 scores from these responses, the authors used regression analysis to produce adjusted "marginal disutilities" for estimating QALYs in cost-utility analysis. These adjusted disutilities are reported in Table 3 of the article.
机译:在2009年5月/ 6月的《医疗决策》中,Petrou和Kupek报告了针对各种残疾和儿童严重疾病的基于偏好的生活质量(QALY)权重。在许多情况下,以前都无法使用QALY砝码。首先通过要求每个孩子的主要看护人使用Health Utilities Index Mark 3(HUI3)报告孩子的健康状况和生活质量来确定权重。从这些响应中得出HUI3分数后,作者使用回归分析来产生调整后的“边际效用”,以估算成本效用分析中的QALY。这些调整后的效用在本文的表3中进行了报告。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号