...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing: Journal of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering >Intra-protocol repeatability and inter-protocol agreement for the analysis of scapulo-humeral coordination
【24h】

Intra-protocol repeatability and inter-protocol agreement for the analysis of scapulo-humeral coordination

机译:肩cap肱协调分析的协议内重复性和协议间一致性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Multi-center clinical trials incorporating shoulder kinematics are currently uncommon. The absence of repeatability and limits of agreement (LoA) studies between different centers employing different motion analysis protocols has led to a lack dataset compatibility. Therefore, the aim of this work was to determine the repeatability and LoA between two shoulder kinematic protocols. The first one uses a scapula tracker (ST), the International Society of Biomechanics anatomical frames and an optoelectronic measurement system, and the second uses a spine tracker, the INAIL Shoulder and Elbow Outpatient protocol (ISEO) and an inertial and magnetic measurement system. First within-protocol repeatability for each approach was assessed on a group of 23 healthy subjects and compared with the literature. Then, the between-protocol agreement was evaluated. The within-protocol repeatability was similar for the ST ((Formula presented.)) and ISEO ((Formula presented.)) protocols and comparable with data from published literature. The between-protocol agreement analysis showed comparable scapula medio-lateral rotation measurements for up to 120° of flexion-extension and up to 100° of scapula plane ab-adduction. Scapula protraction-retraction measurements were in agreement for a smaller range of humeral elevation. The results of this study suggest comparable repeatability for the ST and ISEO protocols and between-protocol agreement for two scapula rotations. Different thresholds for repeatability and LoA may be adapted to suit different clinical hypotheses.
机译:结合肩部运动学的多中心临床试验目前并不常见。在使用不同运动分析协议的不同中心之间缺乏可重复性和协议限制(LoA)研究,导致数据集兼容性不足。因此,这项工作的目的是确定两个肩部运动学方案之间的可重复性和LoA。第一个使用肩骨追踪器(ST),国际生物力学学会解剖学框架和光电测量系统,第二个使用脊柱追踪器,INAIL肩肘肘关节门诊协议(ISEO)和惯性和磁测量系统。在23位健康受试者的组中评估了每种方法的首次方案内重复性,并与文献进行了比较。然后,评估了协议之间的协议。协议内的可重复性与ST((表示公式)。)和ISEO(表示公式)协议相似,并且与已发表文献的数据相当。协议之间的一致性分析显示,肩comparable骨中外侧旋转的测量值可高达120°屈伸伸展和100°肩cap骨平展内收。肩cap骨的伸缩测试与肱骨抬高的较小范围一致。这项研究的结果表明,ST和ISEO协议具有可重复性,两次肩骨旋转协议之间的协议一致。重复性和LoA的不同阈值可以适应不同的临床假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号