首页> 外文期刊>Medical dosimetry: official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists >Larynx-sparing techniques using intensity-modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal cancer
【24h】

Larynx-sparing techniques using intensity-modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal cancer

机译:调强放射疗法治疗口咽癌的喉保留技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of the current study was to explore whether the laryngeal dose can be reduced by using 2 intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques: whole-neck field IMRT technique (WF-IMRT) vs. junctioned IMRT (J-IMRT). The effect on planning target volumes (PTVs) coverage and laryngeal sparing was evaluated. WF-IMRT technique consisted of a single IMRT plan, including the primary tumor and the superior and inferior neck to the level of the clavicular heads. The larynx was defined as an organ at risk extending superiorly to cover the arytenoid cartilages and inferiorly to include the cricoid cartilage. The J-IMRT technique consisted of an IMRT plan for the primary tumor and the superior neck, matched to conventional antero-posterior opposing lower neck fields at the level of the thyroid notch. A central block was used for the anterior lower neck field at the level of the larynx to restrict the dose to the larynx. Ten oropharyngeal cancer cases were analyzed. Both the primary site and bilateral regional lymphatics were included in the radiotherapy targets. The averaged V95 for the PTV57.6 was 99.2% for the WF-IMRT technique compared with 97.4% (p = 0.02) for J-IMRT. The averaged V95 for the PTV64 was 99.9% for the WF-IMRT technique compared with 98.9% (p = 0.02) for J-IMRT and the averaged V95 for the PT70 was 100.0% for WF-IMRT technique compared with 99.5% (p = 0.04) for J-IMRT. The averaged mean laryngeal dose was 18 Gy with both techniques. The averaged mean doses within the matchline volumes were 69.3 Gy for WF-MRT and 66.2 Gy for J-IMRT (p = 0.03). The WF-IMRT technique appears to offer an optimal coverage of the target volumes and a mean dose to the larynx similar with J-IMRT and should be further evaluated in clinical trials.
机译:本研究的目的是探讨是否可以通过使用两种强度调制放射疗法(IMRT)技术来降低喉头剂量:全颈场IMRT技术(WF-IMRT)与结扎IMRT(J-IMRT)。评估了对计划目标量(PTV)覆盖率和喉咙保留的影响。 WF-IMRT技术由单个IMRT计划组成,包括原发肿瘤以及锁骨头部水平的上颈部和下颈部。喉被定义为有风险的器官,其上端延伸至覆盖软骨样软骨,而下端延伸至环形软骨。 J-IMRT技术由针对原发肿瘤和上颈部的IMRT计划组成,在甲状腺切迹的水平与传统的前后相对的下颈部区域相匹配。在喉头水平的中央下阻滞用于前颈下部区域,以限制喉头的剂量。分析了十例口咽癌病例。放射治疗目标包括原发部位和双侧区域淋巴管。 WF-IMRT技术的PTV57.6的平均V95为99.2%,而J-IMRT为97.4%(p = 0.02)。 WF-IMRT技术的PTV64平均V95为99.9%,而J-IMRT技术为98.9%(p = 0.02),PT70的平均V95为WF-IMRT技术为100.0%,而99.5%(p = 0.04)(针对J-IMRT)。两种技术的平均喉平均剂量均为18 Gy。匹配线体积内的平均平均剂量对于WF-MRT为69.3 Gy,对于J-IMRT为66.2 Gy(p = 0.03)。 WF-IMRT技术似乎可以提供最佳的靶区覆盖率,并且与J-IMRT相似,可为喉道提供平均剂量,应在临床试验中进一步评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号