...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical care >Chronic disease management for depression in US medical practices: results from the Health Tracking Physician Survey.
【24h】

Chronic disease management for depression in US medical practices: results from the Health Tracking Physician Survey.

机译:美国医疗实践中针对抑郁症的慢性病管理:“健康跟踪医师调查”的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Chronic care model (CCM) envisages a multicomponent systematic remodeling of ambulatory care to improve chronic diseases management. Application of CCM in primary care management of depression has traditionally lagged behind the application of this model in management of other common chronic illnesses. In past research, the use of CCM has been operationalized by measuring the use of evidence-based organized care management processes (CMPs). OBJECTIVES: To compare the use of CMPs in treatment of depression with the use of these processes in treatment of diabetes and asthma and to examine practice-level correlates of this use. STUDY DESIGN: Using data from the 2008 Health Tracking Physician Survey, a nationally representative sample of physicians in the United States, we compared the use of 5 different CMPs: written guidelines in English and other languages for self-management, availability of staff to educate patients about self-management, availability of nurse care managers for care coordination, and group meetings of patients with staff. We further examined the association of practice-level characteristics with the use of the 5 CMPs for management of depression. RESULTS: CMPs were more commonly used for management of diabetes and asthma than for depression. The use of CMPs for depression was more common in health maintenance organizations [adjusted odds ratios (AOR) ranging from 2.45 to 5.98 for different CMPs], in practices that provided physicians with feedback regarding quality of care to patients (AOR range, 1.42 to 1.69), and in practices with greater use of clinical information technology (AOR range, 1.06 to 1.11). CONCLUSION: The application of CMPs in management of depression continues to lag behind other common chronic conditions. Feedbacks on quality of care and expanded use of information technology may improve application of CMPs for depression care in general medical settings.
机译:背景:慢性护理模型(CCM)设想了门诊护理的多组件系统重塑,以改善慢性病管理。传统上,CCM在抑郁症的初级保健管理中的应用落后于该模型在其他常见慢性疾病的管理中的应用。在过去的研究中,通过测量基于证据的有组织的护理管理流程(CMP)的使用来实现CCM的使用。目的:比较CMP在抑郁症治疗中的使用与这些方法在糖尿病和哮喘治疗中的使用,并检查这种使用在实践水平上的相关性。研究设计:使用来自2008年健康追踪医师调查的数据(美国全国代表性的医生样本),我们比较了5种不同的CMP的使用情况:英语和其他语言的书面指南进行自我管理,工作人员的教育程度有关患者的自我管理,是否有护士护理经理进行护理协调以及与患者进行小组会议。我们进一步检查了实践水平特征与5种CMP治疗抑郁症之间的联系。结果:相比于抑郁症,CMP更常用于糖尿病和哮喘的治疗。在健康维护组织中,使用CMP治疗抑郁症更为普遍[对于不同的CMP,调整后的优势比(AOR)在2.45至5.98之间],这种做法可为医生提供有关患者护理质量的反馈(AOR范围在1.42至1.69 ),以及更多使用临床信息技术的做法(AOR范围为1.06至1.11)。结论:CMPs在抑郁症治疗中的应用仍然落后于其他常见的慢性病。对护理质量和信息技术的广泛使用的反馈可能会改善CMP在抑郁症护理中在一般医疗环境中的应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号