首页> 外文期刊>Medical decision making: An international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making >Improving fast and frugal modeling in relation to regression analysis: test of 3 models for medical decision making.
【24h】

Improving fast and frugal modeling in relation to regression analysis: test of 3 models for medical decision making.

机译:改进与回归分析相关的快速节俭模型:测试3种医疗决策模型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Data from 2 previous studies were reanalyzed, one on judgments regarding drug treatment of hyperlipidemia and the other on diagnosing heart failure. The original MH model and the extended MH model were compared with logistic regression (LR) in terms of fit to actual judgments, number of cues, and the extent to which the cues were consistent with clinical guidelines. RESULTS: There was a slightly better fit with LR compared with MH. The extended MH model gave a significantly better fit than the original MH model in the drug treatment task. In the diagnostic task, the number of cues was significantly lower in the MH models compared to LR, whereas in the therapeutic task, LR could be less or more frugal than the matching heuristic models depending on the significance level chosen for inclusion of cues. For the original MH model, but not for the extended MH model or LR, the most important cues in the drug treatment task were often used in a direction contrary to treatment guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The extended MH model represents an improvement in that prevalence of cue values is adequately taken into account, which in turn may result in better fit and in better agreement with medical guidelines in the evaluation of cues.
机译:背景:重新分析了先前2项研究的数据,一项是关于高脂血症药物治疗的判断,另一项是关于心力衰竭的诊断。将原始MH模型和扩展MH模型与Logistic回归(LR)进行比较,以符合实际判断,提示的数量以及提示与临床指南的一致程度。结果:与MH相比,LR的适应性更好。在药物治疗任务中,扩展的MH模型比原始MH模型具有更好的拟合性。在诊断任务中,与LR相比,MH模型中的线索数量显着减少,而在治疗任务中,LR可能比匹配的启发式模型节俭,这取决于为包含线索而选择的显着性水平。对于原始的MH模型,但对于扩展的MH模型或LR而言,则不是,在药物治疗任务中最重要的提示通常以与治疗指南相反的方向使用。结论:扩展的MH模型表示对提示值的普遍性已得到充分考虑的一种改进,这反过来可能导致在提示的评估中更好地契合并与医学指南更好地吻合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号