【24h】

Evaluation of physicians' cognitive styles

机译:评估医生的认知风格

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background. Patient outcomes critically depend on accuracy of physicians' judgment, yet little is known about individual differences in cognitive styles that underlie physicians' judgments. The objective of this study was to assess physicians' individual differences in cognitive styles relative to age, experience, and degree and type of training. Methods. Physicians at different levels of training and career completed a web-based survey of 6 scales measuring individual differences in cognitive styles (maximizing v. satisficing, analytical v. intuitive reasoning, need for cognition, intolerance toward ambiguity, objectivism, and cognitive reflection). We measured psychometric properties (Cronbach's) of scales; relationship of age, experience, degree, and type of training; responses to scales; and accuracy on conditional inference task. Results. The study included 165 trainees and 56 attending physicians (median age 31 years; range 25-69 years). All 6 constructs showed acceptable psychometric properties. Surprisingly, we found significant negative correlation between age and satisficing (r = 0.239; P = 0.017). Maximizing (willingness to engage in alternative search strategy) also decreased with age (r = 0.220; P = 0.047). Number of incorrect inferences negatively correlated with satisficing (r = 0.246; P = 0.014). Disposition to suppress intuitive responses was associated with correct responses on 3 of 4 inferential tasks. Trainees showed a tendency to engage in analytical thinking (r = 0.265; P = 0.025), while attendings displayed inclination toward intuitive-experiential thinking (r = 0.427; P = 0.046). However, trainees performed worse on conditional inference task. Conclusion. Physicians capable of suppressing an immediate intuitive response to questions and those scoring higher on rational thinking made fewer inferential mistakes. We found a negative correlation between age and maximizing: Physicians who were more advanced in their careers were less willing to spend time and effort in an exhaustive search for solutions. However, they appeared to have maintained their "mindware" for effective problem solving.
机译:背景。患者的结果严重取决于医师判断的准确性,但对于构​​成医师判断的认知方式的个体差异知之甚少。这项研究的目的是评估医生相对于年龄,经验,培训程度和类型的认知方式的个体差异。方法。处于不同培训和职业水平的医师完成了一个基于Web的调查,该调查针对6个量表进行了测量,这些量表用于衡量个体在认知风格上的差异(最大化诉求满意,分析诉求直觉推理,对认知的需求,对歧义的不宽容,客观主义和认知反射)。我们测量了量表的心理测量特性(克伦巴赫);年龄,经验,学位和培训类型之间的关系;对天平的反应;和条件推理任务的准确性。结果。该研究包括165名受训者和56名主治医师(中位年龄31岁;范围25-69岁)。所有6种构建体均显示出可接受的心理测量特性。令人惊讶的是,我们发现年龄和满意度之间存在显着的负相关(r = 0.239; P = 0.017)。随着年龄的增长,最大化(参与替代搜索策略的意愿)也有所降低(r = 0.220; P = 0.047)。与满意度负相关的错误推断数量(r = 0.246; P = 0.014)。抑制直觉反应的倾向与对4个推理任务中的3个的正确反应相关。受训者表现出倾向于进行分析性思考的倾向(r = 0.265; P = 0.025),而参加者则表现出倾向于直觉-体验式思考的倾向(r = 0.427; P = 0.046)。但是,受训者在条件推理任务上的表现较差。结论。能够抑制对问题的直接直觉响应的医师以及在理性思考上得分较高的医师,推理错误的发生率更低。我们发现年龄与最大化之间存在负相关关系:在职业生涯中更高级的医师不愿意花费时间和精力来详尽地寻求解决方案。但是,他们似乎维护了其“思想软件”以有效解决问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号