...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical care >Measuring use and cost of care for patients with mood disorders: the utilization and cost inventory.
【24h】

Measuring use and cost of care for patients with mood disorders: the utilization and cost inventory.

机译:评估情绪障碍患者的使用和护理费用:利用率和费用清单。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Researchers conducting cost-outcome studies must account for all materially relevant care that subjects receive from their care providers. However, access to provider records is often limited. This article describes and tests the Utilization and Cost Inventory (UAC-I), a structured patient interview designed to measure costs of care when access to provider records is limited. METHODS: UAC-I was tested on 212 consenting adult veterans with mood disorder attending a VA medical center. Counts (inpatient days and outpatient encounters) and costs (dollars) computed from survey responses were compared with estimates from medical records and an alternative structured questionnaire. RESULTS: The agreement between inpatient costs computed from provider records and from UAC-I responses, assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), was 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.30-0.84; the bias was -3.7%, 95% CI, -48 to 41. The ICC for the service data (inpatient days) was 0.97, 95% CI, 0.95-0.99; the bias was <1%, 95% CI, -14 to 15. The ICC for outpatient costs computed from provider records and from UAC-I responses was 0.53 95% CI, 0.38-0.65; the bias was <1%, 95% CI, -27 to 27. The ICC for outpatient encounters was 0.74, 95% CI, 0.65-0.80; the bias was <1%, 95% CI, -16 to 18. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that it may be feasible for cost-outcome studies to compare patient groups for inpatient and outpatient costs computed from patient self-reports.
机译:背景:进行费用—结果研究的研究人员必须考虑受试者从其护理提供者那里获得的所有与物质相关的护理。但是,对提供者记录的访问通常受到限制。本文介绍并测试了利用率和成本清单(UAC-I),这是一种结构化的患者访谈,旨在测量在访问提供者记录受到限制时的护理费用。方法:在VA医疗中心对212名有情绪障碍的成年退伍军人进行了UAC-I测试。将根据调查答复计算出的计数(住院天数和门诊病人数)和成本(美元)与病历和其他结构化问卷的估计值进行了比较。结果:使用类内相关系数(ICC)评估的从提供者记录和UAC-I响应计算的住院费用之间的一致性为0.66,95%置信区间(CI)为0.30-0.84;服务数据的ICC(住院天数)为0.97,95%CI,0.95-0.99;偏倚为-3.7%,95%CI,-48至41。偏倚<1%,95%CI,-14至15。根据提供者记录和UAC-I响应计算的门诊费用的ICC为0.53 95%CI,0.38-0.65;偏倚<1%,95%CI,-27至27。门诊患者的ICC为0.74,95%CI,0.65-0.80;偏倚<1%,95%CI,-16到18。结论:这些结果表明,成本结果研究比较患者组的住院病人和门诊病人费用是可行的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号