首页> 外文期刊>Medical history >Loss of Innocence: Albert Moll, Slgmund Freud and the Invention of Childhood Sexuality Around 1900
【24h】

Loss of Innocence: Albert Moll, Slgmund Freud and the Invention of Childhood Sexuality Around 1900

机译:纯真的丧失:艾伯特·摩尔,弗格·弗洛伊德(Slgmund Freud)和1900年左右的童年性发明

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract: This paper analyses how, prior to the work of Sigmund Freud, an understanding of infant and childhood sexuality emerged during the nineteenth century. Key contributors to the debate were Albert Moll, Max Dessoir and others, as fin-de-siecle artists and writers celebrated a sexualised image of the child. By the beginning of the twentieth century, most paediatricians, sexologists, psychologists, psychiatrists, psychoanalysts and pedagogues agreed that sexuality formed part of a child's 'normal' development. This paper argues that the main disagreements in discourses about childhood sexuality related to different interpretations of children's sexual experiences. On the one hand stood an explanation that argued for a homology between children's and adults' sexual experiences, on the other hand was an understanding that suggested that adults and children had distinct and different experiences. Whereas the homological interpretation was favoured by the majority of commentators, including Moll, Freud, and to some extent also by C.G. Jung, the heterological interpretation was supported by a minority, including childhood psychologist Charlotte Buhler.
机译:摘要:本文分析了在西格蒙德·弗洛伊德(Sigmund Freud)工作之前,如何在19世纪产生了对婴儿和儿童性行为的理解。辩论的主要贡献者是阿尔伯特·莫尔(Albert Moll),马克斯·德索瓦(Max Dessoir)等人,鳍鳍类艺术家和作家庆祝了孩子的性形象。到20世纪初,大多数儿科医生,性学家,心理学家,精神科医生,精神分析家和教育家都同意,性是儿童“正常”发育的一部分。本文认为,关于儿童性行为的论述中的主要分歧与对儿童性经历的不同解释有关。一方面是一种解释,认为儿童和成年人的性经历之间存在同源性,另一方面是一种理解,表明成年人和儿童的经历和经历截然不同。鉴于同质解释受到包括Moll,Freud在内的大多数评论者的青睐,并且在某种程度上也受到C.G.荣格(Jung),异质学解释得到了少数人的支持,其中包括儿童心理学家夏洛特·布勒(Charlotte Buhler)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号