首页> 外文期刊>Mayo Clinic Proceedings >Measuring faculty reflection on medical grand rounds at mayo clinic: associations with teaching experience, clinical exposure, and presenter effectiveness.
【24h】

Measuring faculty reflection on medical grand rounds at mayo clinic: associations with teaching experience, clinical exposure, and presenter effectiveness.

机译:在Mayo诊所的医学大回合中测量教职员工的反思:与教学经验,临床经验和演讲者效果的关联。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To develop and validate a new instrument for measuring participant reflection on continuing medical education (CME) and determine associations between the reflection instrument scores and CME presenter, participant, and presentation characteristics.This was a prospective validation study of presenters and faculty at the weekly medical grand rounds at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, from January 1, 2011, through June 30, 2011. Eight items (5-point Likert scales) were developed on the basis of 4 reflection levels: habitual action, understanding, reflection, and critical reflection. Factor analysis was performed to account for clustered data. Interrater and internal consistency reliabilities were calculated. Associations between reflection scores and characteristics of presenters, participants, and presentations were determined.Participants completed a total of 1134 reflection forms. Factor analysis revealed?a 2-dimensional model (eigenvalue; Cronbach α): minimal reflection (1.19; 0.77) and high reflection (2.51; 0.81). Item mean (SD) scores ranged from 2.97 (1.17) to 4.01 (0.83) on a 5-point scale. Interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) for individual items ranged from 0.58 (95% CI, 0.31-0.78) to 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.94). Reflection scores were associated with presenters' speaking effectiveness (P<.001) and prior CME teaching experience (P=.02), participants' prior clinical experiences (P<.001), and presentations that were case based (P<.001) and used the audience response system (P<.001).We report the first validated measure of reflection on CME at medical grand rounds. Reflection scores were associated with presenters' effectiveness and prior teaching experience, participants' clinical exposures, and presentations that were interactive and clinically relevant. Future research should determine whether reflection on CME leads to better patient outcomes.
机译:开发并验证一种用于测量参与者对继续医学教育(CME)的反思的新工具,并确定反思工具得分与CME演讲者,参与者和演讲者特征之间的关联,这是对每周医学演讲者和教师进行的前瞻性验证研究于2011年1月1日至2011年6月30日在明尼苏达州罗彻斯特市梅奥诊所进行大型轮诊。在4种思考水平的基础上,开发了八项(5点李克特量表):习惯性行为,理解,反思和批判反射。进行因子分析以说明聚类数据。计算了内部评估者信度和内部一致性信度。确定了反映得分与演讲者,参与者和演讲者的特征之间的关联。参与者总共完成了1134个反映形式。因子分析揭示了一个二维模型(特征值; Cronbachα):最小反射(1.19; 0.77)和高反射​​(2.51; 0.81)。项目平均(SD)分数在5分制中从2.97(1.17)到4.01(0.83)不等。单个项目的评估者间信度(类内相关系数)在0.58(95%CI,0.31-0.78)至0.88(95%CI,0.80-0.94)之间。反思分数与演讲者的口语能力(P <.001)和先前的CME教学经验(P = .02),参与者的先前临床经验(P <.001)和基于案例的演讲相关(P <.001) ),并使用了观众回应系统(P <.001)。我们报告了医疗大回合中对CME进行反思的第一个有效量度。反思分数与演讲者的效能和先前的教学经验,参与者的临床暴露以及具有互动性和临床相关性的演讲相关。未来的研究应该确定对CME的反思是否可以带来更好的患者预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号