...
首页> 外文期刊>Mayo Clinic Proceedings >Wide variation in clinicians' assessment of New York Heart Association/World Health Organization functional class in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
【24h】

Wide variation in clinicians' assessment of New York Heart Association/World Health Organization functional class in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

机译:对于肺动脉高压患者,纽约心脏协会/世界卫生组织功能等级的临床医生评估差异很大。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To assess interrater reliability of the New York Heart Association/World Health Organization functional classification as applied by clinicians (defined as both physicians and nurses in this article) to patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 16 and August 31, 2007, a survey that described 10 hypothetical patients was completed by physicians and nurses attending a conference on PAH. Results were subsequently validated with physicians and nurses who were contacted online through the Pulmonary Hypertension Association. Respondents were asked to assign each patient's functional class as they would normally in clinical practice. RESULTS: The functional class evaluations were completed by 113 clinicians, 87 (77%) of whom had participated in PAH trials; 106 (94%) reported using functional class when determining therapy. Clinicians reported a broad range of factors they considered when evaluating functional class, and their assessments of functional class varied widely. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.58 for the initial patient survey and 0.62 for the online survey. At best, one patient was ranked as either class II (by 60 clinicians [53%]) or class III (by 53 [47%]). Clinicians' rankings spanned at least 3 functional classes for each of the other patients. Equally divergent rankings were observed among nurses and physicians. Cluster analysis identified clinicians' tendencies toward "higher" or "lower" functional class rankings. Of the 113 clinicians, 101 (89%) thought that the patients described resembled those seen in their practices. CONCLUSION: Despite the wide use of the New York Heart Association/World Health Organization functional class in clinical care and as a research tool, interrater agreement may be inadequate. Efforts to promote a uniform approach to evaluating functional class might help to standardize PAH care and research.
机译:目的:评估临床医师(本文定义为医生和护士)对肺动脉高压(PAH)患者使用的纽约心脏协会/世界卫生组织功能分类的间位信度。患者与方法:在2007年3月16日至8月31日之间,参加PAH会议的医师和护士完成了一项描述10名假设患者的调查。随后,通过肺动脉高压协会在线联系的医生和护士对结果进行了验证。要求受访者按照临床实践中通常的方式分配每个患者的功能类别。结果:113位临床医生完成了功能分类评估,其中87位(77%)参加了PAH试验。报告确定治疗时使用功能分类的研究为106(94%)。临床医生报告说,他们在评估功能等级时考虑了各种各样的因素,并且他们对功能等级的评估差异很大。初始患者调查的组内相关系数是0.58,而在线调查的组内相关系数是0.62。充其量,一名患者被评为II级(由60名临床医生[53%])或III级(由53名[47%])。对于其他每个患者,临床医生的排名至少涵盖了3个功能类别。护士和医师之间的排名也存在差异。聚类分析确定了临床医生倾向于“更高”或“更低”的功能类别排名。在113位临床医生中,有101位(89%)认为患者的描述与他们的实践相似。结论:尽管纽约心脏协会/世界卫生组织功能类别在临床护理中被广泛使用,并且作为研究工具,但相互间的协议可能不足。努力促进采用统一的方法来评估功能等级,可能有助于标准化PAH护理和研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号